Cars - Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...

AutoBanter (http://www.autobanter.com/index.php)

- Corvette (http://www.autobanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=22)

- - Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all... (http://www.autobanter.com/showthread.php?t=205310)

Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...

Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
crashing down on the day of 9/11.

The third building, WTC 7, can be seen here

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329

There is no mention of this building in 911 Omission Report.

Can fire make a building come crashing down at free fall speed?

If you think it can, patent the idea and make billions in the
demolitions industry!

How do we know WTC 7 was demolished?

If WTC 7 collapsed in 6 seconds, and it takes 6 seconds to free fall
from the roof of WTC 7, then you got it - WTC 7 underwent a free fall.

This means as the each floor was falling straight to the ground it did
so without crashing into anything on the way. ONLY CONTROLLED
DEMOLITION CAN ACCOMPLISH THAT!

PROPOSITION 1:
It took a total of 6 seconds for the roof of WTC 7 to reach the
ground. This proposition is supported by the empirical,

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329
Collapse start time: 17 seconds
Collapse end time: 23 seconds
Total collapse time: 23-17 = 6 seconds

PROPOSITION 2:
A free fall from a height equal to the roof of WTC 7 would take 6
seconds. This proposition derives trivially through (Galilean)
kinematical considerations alone:

Displacement = initial velocity * total time + 1/2 * acceleration *
total time^2

or

s = ut + 1/2at^2
where
s = 174 m (height of building)
u = 0 m/s (building was stationary prior to collapse)
a = 9.8 m/s^2 (since gravitational field strengh averages at
a constant)

Thus,
174 = 0 t + 1/2 9.8 t^2

Solving for t
t = sqrt( 2 * 174 / 9.8)
= 5.9590
~ 6 seconds

Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...

In article om>,
says...
> Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
> crashing down on the day of 9/11.
>
> The third building, WTC 7, can be seen here
>
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329
>
> There is no mention of this building in 911 Omission Report.
>
> Can fire make a building come crashing down at free fall speed?
>
> If you think it can, patent the idea and make billions in the
> demolitions industry!
>
> How do we know WTC 7 was demolished?
>
> If WTC 7 collapsed in 6 seconds, and it takes 6 seconds to free fall
> from the roof of WTC 7, then you got it - WTC 7 underwent a free fall.
>
> This means as the each floor was falling straight to the ground it did
> so without crashing into anything on the way. ONLY CONTROLLED
> DEMOLITION CAN ACCOMPLISH THAT!
>
> PROPOSITION 1:
> It took a total of 6 seconds for the roof of WTC 7 to reach the
> ground. This proposition is supported by the empirical,
>
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329
> Collapse start time: 17 seconds
> Collapse end time: 23 seconds
> Total collapse time: 23-17 = 6 seconds
>
> PROPOSITION 2:
> A free fall from a height equal to the roof of WTC 7 would take 6
> seconds. This proposition derives trivially through (Galilean)
> kinematical considerations alone:
>
> Displacement = initial velocity * total time + 1/2 * acceleration *
> total time^2
>
> or
>
> s = ut + 1/2at^2
> where
> s = 174 m (height of building)
> u = 0 m/s (building was stationary prior to collapse)
> a = 9.8 m/s^2 (since gravitational field strengh averages at
> a constant)
>
> Thus,
> 174 = 0 t + 1/2 9.8 t^2
>
> Solving for t
> t = sqrt( 2 * 174 / 9.8)
> = 5.9590
> ~ 6 seconds
>
>

Since the building actually took over twice that long to collapse, your
"cipherin'" is meaningless, Jethro. In no way did the WTC collapses
resemble a controlled demo.

BDK

Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...

In article om>,
wrote:

> Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
> crashing down on the day of 9/11.
>
> The third building, WTC 7, can be seen here
>
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329
>
> There is no mention of this building in 911 Omission Report.
>
> Can fire make a building come crashing down at free fall speed?

< Snip >

How the hell do think steel is made? The answer is yes.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...

wrote:
> http://www.popularmechanics.com/tech...w/1227842.html
>
>
Popular Mechanics. Wahahahaha........Ladies Home Journal does a nice report
on what really happened too. Wahahahaha.........

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...

After solving for your lack of brain matter, you're a genuine moron!

wrote:

Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...

On Oct 20, 1:34 am, Venger > wrote:
> wrote:
> > Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
> > crashing down on the day of 9/11.
>
> Most people report they believe in ghosts and UFOs, which when combined
> with 9/11 conspiracies make three addle-minded make-believe bits of idiocy.
>
> <snipped nincompoopery>
>
> Truthers are stupid.
>
> Venger

Mr. Silverstein, the owner of the World Trade Center buildings
admitted to pulling building 7 in a PBS special.
see a clip on google video: http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329
According to several websites building 7 collapsed at or around 5:20
pm, just over 6 hours after the first two towers fell. Pretty
impressive demolitions job considering in 6 hours a crew was called up
with materials in hand and rigged that 47 story building to blow.

Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...

On Oct 24, 9:30 am, wrote:
> On Oct 20, 1:34 am, Venger > wrote:
>
> > wrote:
> > > Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
> > > crashing down on the day of 9/11.
>
> > Most people report they believe in ghosts and UFOs, which when combined
> > with 9/11 conspiracies make three addle-minded make-believe bits of idiocy.
>
> > <snipped nincompoopery>
>
> > Truthers are stupid.
>
> > Venger
>
> Mr. Silverstein, the owner of the World Trade Center buildings
> admitted to pulling building 7 in a PBS special.
> see a clip on google video:http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329
> According to several websites building 7 collapsed at or around 5:20
> pm, just over 6 hours after the first two towers fell.

- Pretty impressive demolitions job considering in 6 hours
- a crew was called up with materials in hand and rigged
- that 47 story building to blow.

Yes a Good Example of that All American
"Know How" and Can Do Attitude ! ~ RHF

Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...

In article .com>,
says...
> On Oct 20, 1:34 am, Venger > wrote:
> > wrote:
> > > Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
> > > crashing down on the day of 9/11.
> >
> > Most people report they believe in ghosts and UFOs, which when combined
> > with 9/11 conspiracies make three addle-minded make-believe bits of idiocy.
> >
> > <snipped nincompoopery>
> >
> > Truthers are stupid.
> >
> > Venger
>
> Mr. Silverstein, the owner of the World Trade Center buildings
> admitted to pulling building 7 in a PBS special.
> see a clip on google video: http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329
> According to several websites building 7 collapsed at or around 5:20
> pm, just over 6 hours after the first two towers fell. Pretty
> impressive demolitions job considering in 6 hours a crew was called up
> with materials in hand and rigged that 47 story building to blow.
>
>
>

It's amazing what nonsense the 911 kooks will swallow. It normally takes
months, minimum to set up a building for demolition, but yet the kooks
claim it was done almost instantly.

A kook's mind is a terrible thing to...umm, waste again?

BDK