On Oct 25, 5:49 pm, "L.W. \(Bill\) Hughes III"
> wrote:
> Cool. Let us know the real outcome. Not what a bought and paid for
> magazine would print.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> /
>
> "nrs" > wrote in message
>
> oups.com...
>
>
>
> > It could be lying but supposedly it is a chart that is not generally
> > made available to the public. Who knows? What I can say is that
> > some local guys who had Yjs and TJs and then bought JKs are pretty
> > happy with them. A shootout was organized locally to test the TJ
> > rubicon and the JK rubicon on the same day, same obstacles, etc and
> > the JK was declared to be the clear winner. Another shootout was
> > organized to compare the TJ rubicon with a Toyota FJ cruiser and the
> > cruiser had to abort because the control arms were getting bent just
> > from the flexing!
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

Here is the link. It is in Spanish so not everyone here will
understand but the general consensus was that the JK did a bit
better. You will see from the pictures that it was tough terrain and
the vehicles were used hard.

http://www.jeeperos.com/foros/showth...paracion+TJ+JK