Thread: More power to the police in high speed pursuit
View Single Post
  #104  
Old May 11th 07, 05:32 PM posted to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
Joe[_61_]
external usenet poster
  
Posts: 3
Default More power to the police in high speed pursuit
(Brent P) wrote in
:

> In article >, Joe wrote:
>> (Brent P) wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> In article >, Joe wrote:
>>>> (Brent P) wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> In article >, Joe wrote:
>>>>>> (Brent P) wrote in
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>
>>>>>><huge snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OK, Brent, I'll play along. Exactly what is your point in 50
>>>>>> words or less?
>>>>>
>>>>> Initially? That defining reasonable, normal, and safe behavior
>> illegal
>>>>> has negative consquences. One of those negative consquences with
>>>>> regard to under posted speed limits is dangerous police chases
>>>>> that can result in death or injury.
>>>>
>>>> OK, even though I disagree with it, I get your point. But a
>> glittering
>>>> generality like that simply isn't true because it's a glittering
>>>> generality. In short, it's a trolling statement. Bait on a hook.
>>>
>>> Go look up trolling some time, just having a different view than you
>>> isn't.
>>
>> Let's nip this in the bud before it gets ridiculous.
>>
>> My differing view has nothing to do with your statement. Your
>> statement is so general and outrageous that it's simply designed to
>> elicit a knee- jerk reaction. Thus, a troll.
>
> If that's the way you feel, kill file me then...

I don't use a killfile. At any rate, you don't offend me in the least.
I'm simply saying that starting off with an absurd generality puts you
right in the troll camp.

> but wait, the thread
> was about police chases and cutting down the carnage from them.....
> I'm sorry all you law-is-law (but only for other people (since you
> don't actually obey it to the letter yourselves)) types got upset
> about it. It's a fairly captian obvious statement.

I didn't read the whole thread, which is why I asked you for your point
in 50 words or less.

Now don't go telling me I'm a "law-is-law" type, because you have no
idea what "type" I am. I'm not upset at all. Remember, my first post
to you about all this stuff was to call you a freakin' idiot. So far
you've done nothing to make me want to take that back.
Ads