On 25/02/2018 14:16, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
> In article >,
> Fredxx > wrote:
>>> Forgot you'd not be keeping up. I was referring to Fred making such a hash
>>> of using 'Newtonian Mechanics' to try and support a flawed argument.
>
>> You've proven on numerous occasions you don't have a clue on Newtonian
>> mechanics.
>
> Thought it wouldn't be long before you tried to bring this up again.
>
> You tried every trick in the book in an attempt to prove my original
> statement about BHP versus torque in a road going car was incorrect and
> failed dismally. Despite introducing every single red herring you could
> find.

There was no trick, just a simple multiple choice problem put to you by
Peter Hill.

> And got all upset when I refused to answer all the silly questions you
> kept coming up with.

No refusal, you simply didn't have a clue. It was one problem, there
were no "silly questions".