"dwight" > writes:
>
> No, don't think so. At the very least, the police have to follow this nut to
> be on the scene when he slams into something other than a tree.
>
> When someone fails to surrender, you think they should just be let go?

Not exactly. But depending on what you want them for, and what the
danger to others is, that may be the best bet -- if all he was wanted
for was speeding (and he wasn't driving erratically), the chase
probably shouldn't have happened.

If they really think he's going to slam into something other than a
tree, they need to get him stopped before that happens. Once the
chase was under weigh in earnest, and he was weaving and running stop
lights, it was time to get him stopped.