"Cartlon Shew" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:18:11 GMT, "jaybird" > wrote:
>
>>
>>"Wooly" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:56:31 GMT, "jaybird" > spewed
>>> forth :
>>>
>>>
>>>>when have you heard of a restaurant serving a pitcher to an individual.
>>>
>>> I was sitting in Waterloo the other night. The guy at the next table
>>> (alone, mind you) ordered a pitcher of whatever, sucked it down in
>>> less than 15 and ordered another. So much for all that TABC training
>>> the servers are required to take.
>>
>>Ok but we're not talking about Waterloo. Hooters has a policy not to
>>serve
>>pitchers to individuals, and no more than one pitcher per person per
>>table.
>
> So now Jaybird's an expert on Hooter's serving policies - is there
> something you want to tell us?

I've already said it. Hooters won't serve more than one pitcher per person
per table.

>
>
> For those just joining the thread:
> }}}Deputy stopped, not arrested after drinking, driving -
> }}}Police say they couldn't legally prove deputy was intoxicated in
> Feb. 6
> }}}incident
> }}}By Melissa Ludwig
> }}}AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF
> }}}Tuesday, February 22, 2005
> }}}ROUND ROCK - An off-duty Williamson County sheriff's deputy stopped
> }}}by police this month smelled of alcohol, but was not arrested
> because
> }}}he refused a field sobriety test and officers could not prove he
> was
> }}}legally drunk, according to police reports.
> }}}
> }}}http://tinyurl.com/5ypaq
>
>
> Predictably, Jaybird is telling us the cop wasn't drunk.

I'm telling you that the Round Rock Police Department said they didn't have
enough probable cause to believe the driver was intoxicated.