On mucho experience with hunters and game management while farming, raising
cattle and breaking horses. Any farmer knows that if you put 125 head on a
pasture that can only support 100, they will eat all the grass then pull up the
roots then all starve, leaving perhaps a dozen alive. Same goes for deer and
other game. It is essential to limit their population to what their habitat can
support. That's a scientific fact born out by practical experience - nothing
"bleeding heart" or "democrat" about it.

It is also factual to say that few hunters today hunt for meat. Some of my
neighbors do. They organize a drive every year and kill more deer in a day than
the sport hunters do in a season, but those who hunt solo, often from tree
stands, swear that drives are not hunting, especially if you use dogs. But
either way they spend more $$ on the hunt than they would pay for a side of beef
or pork. Ergo, they are not doing it to eat.

What has that got to do with "bleeding heart liberals wacko limp democrats"?
The ones I know dispise hunting and game management.

"L.W.(Bill) Hughes III" > wrote
> From what do you base that stupid remark on! I will never under
> these bleeding heart liberals wacko limp democrats!
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> http://www.billhughes.com/
>
> Vito wrote:
> >
> > We also kill to prevent overpopulation. Few hunters today kill to eat.