"¥ UltraMan ¥" > wrote:
> "proffsl" > wrote in message
> > Larry > wrote:
> >> proffsl > wrote:
>
> >> > You can not be rightfully required to obtain a Driver License
> >> > before Driving, as Driving is a part of your Right of Locomotion.
>
> >> There is no such thing as a "right of locomotion."
>
> > Sure there is.
>
> Where?

Under your nose.


> > In reality,
>
> Who's "reality" ?

The reality WE live in.


> > and in the eyes of our forfathers,
>
> They're dead.

We all die. You will too.


> >and their courts.
>
> They're dead too.

What's your point?


> >> > Read why
> >> > he
>
> >> >http://proffsl.110mb.com/locomotion.php
>
> >> >http://proffsl.110mb.com/driving.php
>
> >> >http://proffsl.110mb.com/driver_licensing.php
>
> >> So you think there's a right to drive a car, but not a right to
> >> be a passenger in one? Interesting. Bizarre, but interesting.
>
> > So, if I had a Right to be a passenger,
>
> You don't.

You don't follow well, do you. Larry is the one who thinks we have a
Right to be passengers, to be Transported. No such Right exists.


> > then I would have the Right to obligate you, or anyone else, to
> > Transport me as a passenger to anywhere my little heart might
> > desire.
>
> You're drunk again, loser.

Baseless accusations. Besides, Larry is the one who thinks we have
the Right to be Transported. Not me. Are you too drunk to follow the
thread?


> >Bizarre, but interesting.
>
> > No, nobody can have an Inherent Right to anything that would obligate
> > any othes to provide for them.
>
> You mean like roadways, streets, highways, design, contruxtion and
> maintence of same?

Can you point out where I made any claim we have an Inherent Right to
roadways, streets, highways, or their design, construction and
maintenance? I doubt it, cause I never did.

That is an Acquired Right which we acquire when paying highway usage
taxes.


> > That would violate the very principle
> > of Inherent Rights.
>
> Where is that a legal principle ?

The U.S. Supreme Court is not the end all to everything.


> > It is not Inherent in one's creation that there
> > are going to be others to provide for them.
>
> So don't use the roadways, streets and highways that other's
> provide for you, jackass.

You are a beligerant fool. In your zest to be beligerant, you blindly
stumble over the truth and never see it.


> Just drive around in circles in your own backyard, no license
> required.

I'm not here to take directives from you.


> > If you're interested in the true nature of Inherent Rights, not the
> > twisted one I'm sure you think you understand, then you can
> > read on that at:
>
> >http://proffsl.110mb.com/inherent_rights.php
>
> In what country do such Inherent Rights have protection under law?

Inherent Rights are not endowed by countrys.