proffsl wrote:
> Harry K > wrote:
>> proffsl > wrote:
>>> "¥ UltraMan ¥" > wrote:
>>>> "proffsl" > wrote in message
>>>>> Larry > wrote:
>>>>>> proffsl > wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>>>> No, nobody can have an Inherent Right to anything that would
>>>>> obligate any othes to provide for them.
>>
>>>> You mean like roadways, streets, highways, design, contruxtion and
>>>> maintence of same?
>>
>>> Can you point out where I made any claim we have an Inherent Right
>>> to roadways, streets, highways, or their design, construction and
>>> maintenance? I doubt it, cause I never did.
>>
>>> That is an Acquired Right which we acquire when paying highway usage
>>> taxes.
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> Weird. You agree that the government has the right to charge for the
>> use of the highways but not to regulate your driving on them.
>>
>> Logic thy name is not 'proffs'
>
> To the contrary. Our public highways are built on our public Right of
> Ways. We all have the Right to use our public Right of Ways for
> personal locomotion, which is to travel at our own inclination (not be
> Transported at the inclination of another).

Really? So you can fly your own aircraft any damn time and any damn
place you desire, in any fashion that suits you, eh ?

Or isn't the sky a "public right of way" ?



> Nobody can rightfully just
> come along and cover our public Right of Ways with highways then claim
> to have covered up, or done away, with our Right to use the public
> Right of Ways.

Really? Even if that "nobody" paid for and aquired those "right of ways" via
due process ?


>
> Highways were not really needed until the use of automobiles became
> prolific.

So which came first, the chicken or the prolific automobile ?


> At the advent of automobiles, their drivers had every Right
> to use the unimproved public Right of Ways to travel upon as did the
> horse and buggy or any other means of travel at that time.
>
> Then, of course, the use of automobiles became quite prolific,

It's called "progress" ... give it some thought when arguing arcane
archaic social theories.

<snip rest of drunken blather>