Come on fellows can't we all just get along?

This whole mess is about casting the first stone and will go on forever. It
is exactly like the Israel and Palestine they have been fighting for
thousands of years with no relief in sight. They say each started it and
keep throwing rocks. Can we be better than that? Just like them the
bystanders are catching the hell and it is at least unprofessional,
impolite, rude and just down right un American. Our enemies are now our
friends.

Coasty

"Pink Freud `" > wrote in message
news
> On Fri, 30 May 2008 18:57:46 -0600, Earle Horton wrote:
>
>> "Pink Freud `" > wrote in message
>> news
>>> On Fri, 30 May 2008 16:03:56 -0600, Earle Horton wrote:
>>>
>> /////Snipped/////
>>>
>>> He did make a credible and viable threat to me on 3 or 4 occasions, and
>>> the RCMP and CSIS both have open files on him, and they share that info
>>> with the FBI and other Acronymical Amurrican Agencies.
>>
>> You're lying,
>
> Sorry, oh sorry one.
>
> I'm not a liar. Never have been, never will be, and I emphatically dislike
> it in others.
>
> Your 'accusation' is in fact just that, an accusation. It's just
> something you choose, want or need to believe. A half-baked opinion. Truth
> it is not.
>
> I may on occasion make a humoUrous remark that someone of your (in)ability
> takes as a serious remark, but, no, I do /not/ lie.
>
> I have no need to. And I would love you to prove otherwise.
>
> I happily live by my reputation in much finer and loftier places than the
> slums of Usenet, and it holds up very well indeed.
>
> I value the opinions held of me from those I respect, and I am
> well-respected indeed.
>
> Your opinion counts for naught.
>
>> just like Bill does when he says someone in ABPA or alt.usenet.kooks is
>> going to get a subpoena or have their posting privileges cancelled. I
>> don't understand "viable threat" at all.
>
> There seems to be a lot you don't understand.
>
>> My rose bushes are
>> viable, Hillary and Obama are viable presidential candidates, etc. It
>> must be a Canadian thing.
>
> It is, evidently. Comes from 'vitae habilis' with the common quasi-legal
> meaning of 'something which reasonably could be carried out'. Common
> parlance, not legalese.
>
>
>> If the RCMP and CSIS told you they have open files on Bill, heh heh it
>> just proves that some Canadians have a sense of humor.
>
> HumoUr.
>
> SOP here. In fact, the RCMP wants to be alerted. They solicit it.
>
> We have very strong gun laws here, and even more stringent 'hate laws',
> and they /are/ enforced. And they don't want potential troublemakers
> wandering over our border.
>
> All it takes is one simple forwarding of an email from Billieboi to me
> making a threat of physical harm -- /NOT/ a Usenet post -- to the RCMP, as
> they ask people to do, and the rest is automatic.
>
> Don't believe it?
>
> Who cares?
>
>> I am sure everyone in the
>> "Cooks" news group takes this as evidence, that you are one of their
>> own...
>>
>>
>>> That's more than enough for a petty nuisance, I think.
>>
>> More evidence of your "Cook"ness.
>>
>>
>>> As for what you (and your ward) choose to think, wll, 'Franky, my dear,
>>> I don't give a damn.'
>>>
>>> Back in the hole you go, Erlio.
>>>
>>>> Message-ID: >
>>>>
>>>> Yes, there's a bitch that replies to me, kinda telling me the
>>>> problem's with the Canadian Shaw's personnel. But prescience pays off
>>>> and long as you violate the groups charter, or just Usenet's common
>>>> decency, I'll be there to report you. You being a traitor is a
>>>> especial incentive.
>>>>
>> "Usenet's common decency" that's a good one.
>
> Well, your enamorato wrote it, you should be proud.
>
>> The fact that you and Terry
>> continue to post in the Jeep group just proves that you are jerks that
>> can't take a joke
>
> Please, for Grid's sake, come to grips with the fact that you have no
> recognizable sense of humour, except in your own mind, and wouldn't know a
> real joke if one walked up and bit you.
>
>> or leave well enough alone. Do you wear a plaid shirt and one of those
>> "took" things?
>
> Tuque.
>
>>
>> Perrea, perrea,
>>
>> Earle
>
> Learn how to spell canceled, eh, hoser?
>
> <koo lookookoo koo koo koo koo!>
>
> --
> "Facts? Who needs facts? Insinuations, wild assumptions and unprovable
> allegations work just fine for me."
>
> -- Anonymous, Jr.
>
>
>
>