A Cars forum. AutoBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AutoBanter forum » Auto newsgroups » Driving
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Constitution protects giving the finger to police officers, court rules



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 16th 19, 01:22 AM posted to alt.politics.usa.constitution,alt.law-enforcement,mi.news,rec.autos.driving,sac.politics
Rob Woodward
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Constitution protects giving the finger to police officers, court rules

Turns out, the right to give a police officer the finger is protected
by the Constitution, a federal appeals court ruled this week.

Judge Jeffrey Sutton of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit
wrote in his opinion Wednesday that “Fits of rudeness or lack of
gratitude may violate the Golden Rule. But that doesn't make them
illegal or for that matter punishable."

“Any reasonable officer would know that a citizen who raises her
middle finger engages in speech protected by the First Amendment,” he
wrote later.

According to the court documents, plaintiff Debra Cruise-Gulyas was
pulled over for speeding in Taylor, Mich. in 2017, but Officer Matthew
Wayne Minard wrote her a ticket for a non-moving violation, a lesser
offense.

Cruise-Gulyas still chose to give him the finger as she drove away, so
he pulled her over again, this time changing the ticket to a moving
violation.

However, the court determined Cruise-Gulyas did not break the law in
order for the second stop to be legitimate. She was “at most
exercising her free speech rights,” the court said.

By stopping her the second time, Minard also violated her Fourth
Amendment rights as well. The court determined the second stop was an
“unreasonable seizure.”

Though Minard compared his case to a prosecutor taking back a plea
deal if a defendant behaved badly, the court did not agree, “because
these facts differ materially.”

“As alleged, the first stop had ended, a constitutionally significant
event, before the officer initiated the second, unjustified stop,” the
court added.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/constitut...rs-court-rules

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---
Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Giving the finger to money making radar traps Eric Prilovich Driving 4 January 4th 13 10:47 AM
UK - Fury as 90,000 police officers caught speeding are 'let off' Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS[_1_] Driving 22 June 2nd 07 12:14 AM
2 police officers shot today in downtown Long Beach CA [email protected] Driving 1 December 23rd 06 09:18 AM
Police chief who forces a ticket quota on his officers... J Rainey General 3 May 22nd 06 05:45 AM
Police chief who forces a ticket quota on his officers... dwz General 0 February 2nd 06 04:11 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2019 AutoBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.