Help fighting speeding tickets

On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 22:02:28 -0800, Scott en Aztlán
> wrote:

>On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 13:33:19 -0700, Big Bill > wrote:
>
>>>>You're ignoring those who say they have and or have heard it recently.
>>>>Why is that? Is it because you have whit of a brain?
>>>
>>>I don't care a whit for your Ad Hominem attacks - it's a sure sign
>>>that your have an indefensible position.
>>
>>You're a fine one to talk about ad hominem attacks.
>>Nutjobs, anyone?
>
>Um, do you have a response to my argument in there anywhere? Or are Ad
>Hominems all you have left?

Evidently, you don't know what an 'ad hominem' attack is.
>
>I anxiously await your tapes of a TV or radio show, or your newspaper
>clipping, showing the work "whit" being used.

You brought it up, not me.
I eagerly await *your* tapes showing that no one uses "whit".
--
Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"

On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 22:08:43 -0800, Scott en Aztlán
> wrote:

>On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 15:41:27 -0500, Odinn >
>wrote:
>
>>Funny how it was YOU who setup a position that has shown to be
>>indefensible and started off with the ad hominem attacks calling the
>>rest of us nutjobs.
>
>That's only true if the rest of you use the word "whit" on a daily
>basis.
>
>Talk about indefensible positions...

Here's a shovel...

--
Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"

On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 22:08:43 -0800, Scott en Aztlán
> wrote:

>On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 15:41:27 -0500, Odinn >
>wrote:
>
>>Funny how it was YOU who setup a position that has shown to be
>>indefensible and started off with the ad hominem attacks calling the
>>rest of us nutjobs.
>
>That's only true if the rest of you use the word "whit" on a daily
>basis.
>
>Talk about indefensible positions...

Here's a shovel...

--
Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"

Scott en Aztlán wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 08:55:46 -0500, Odinn >
> wrote:
>
>
>>>>Funny how it was YOU who setup a position that has shown to be
>>>>indefensible and started off with the ad hominem attacks calling the
>>>>rest of us nutjobs.
>>>
>>>That's only true if the rest of you use the word "whit" on a daily
>>>basis.
>>>
>>>Talk about indefensible positions...
>>>
>>
>>Oh, now it has to be DAILY. You didn't ask that question before, and I
>>quote.
>>
>>I invite everyone who has used the word "whit" in casual conversation
>>within the last month to respond to this post by saying "aye."
>>
>>Talk about indefensible positions.
>
>
> Whit the fick is your priblim, duid?
>
> Jeesus H. Tapdancin' Christ, what a silly argument this is.
>
> The evidence has been presented. The audience can now make up it's own
> mind whether it gives a whit.
>
> Next topic!
>
You're damn right the evidence has been presented. You asked if anyone
had used in the last month, several of responded that we did.
Therefore, you're the one left with the indefensible position that it
isn't used.

--
Odinn

'03 FLHTI ........... http://www.sloanclan.org/gallery/ElectraGlide
'97 VN1500D ......... http://www.sloanclan.org/gallery/VulcanClassic
Atlanta Biker Net ... http://www.atlantabiker.net
Vulcan Riders Assoc . http://www.vulcanriders.org

rot13 to reply

Scott en Aztlán wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 08:55:46 -0500, Odinn >
> wrote:
>
>
>>>>Funny how it was YOU who setup a position that has shown to be
>>>>indefensible and started off with the ad hominem attacks calling the
>>>>rest of us nutjobs.
>>>
>>>That's only true if the rest of you use the word "whit" on a daily
>>>basis.
>>>
>>>Talk about indefensible positions...
>>>
>>
>>Oh, now it has to be DAILY. You didn't ask that question before, and I
>>quote.
>>
>>I invite everyone who has used the word "whit" in casual conversation
>>within the last month to respond to this post by saying "aye."
>>
>>Talk about indefensible positions.
>
>
> Whit the fick is your priblim, duid?
>
> Jeesus H. Tapdancin' Christ, what a silly argument this is.
>
> The evidence has been presented. The audience can now make up it's own
> mind whether it gives a whit.
>
> Next topic!
>
You're damn right the evidence has been presented. You asked if anyone
had used in the last month, several of responded that we did.
Therefore, you're the one left with the indefensible position that it
isn't used.

--
Odinn

'03 FLHTI ........... http://www.sloanclan.org/gallery/ElectraGlide
'97 VN1500D ......... http://www.sloanclan.org/gallery/VulcanClassic
Atlanta Biker Net ... http://www.atlantabiker.net
Vulcan Riders Assoc . http://www.vulcanriders.org

rot13 to reply

On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 18:32:54 -0800, Scott en Aztlán
> wrote:

>On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 08:21:11 -0700, Big Bill > wrote:
>
>>Evidently, you don't know what an 'ad hominem' attack is.
>
>Argumentum Ad Hominem: it's where you attack ME instead of attacking
>the substance of my argument.

Evidently, you don't know what "sarcasm" is.

--
Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"

On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 18:32:54 -0800, Scott en Aztlán
> wrote:

>On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 08:21:11 -0700, Big Bill > wrote:
>
>>Evidently, you don't know what an 'ad hominem' attack is.
>
>Argumentum Ad Hominem: it's where you attack ME instead of attacking
>the substance of my argument.

Evidently, you don't know what "sarcasm" is.

--
Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"