If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Nuclear batteries.
Uranium is so Last Century - Enter Thorium, the New Green Nuke.
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=287736 cuhulin |
Ads |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Nuclear batteries.
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Nuclear batteries.
jim > wrote in
: > > > "E. Meyer" wrote: > >> On 4/14/10 11:34 AM, in article >> , "jim" >> > wrote: >> >> > >> >> The attributions are getting messed up here. I was responding to >> chuckcar's response to AZNomad where he stated: > > Ok, to be fair, everybody who said the US has no nuclear power was > also incorrect.. > >> Yes, that was *you* AFAIK. Misunderstanding my post. Message-ID: > Your reply: Message-ID: > To a post where I talk about per capita usage and never mention *anything* about lack or amount of US nuclear power. Nor did Mr. Meyer ever state such. If you can give me a message ID showing someone else stating the US has no nuclear power is this thread who you replied to, I of course will retract the above. -- (setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) ) |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Nuclear batteries.
In article >, chuckcar > wrote:
wrote in : > >> Uranium is so Last Century - Enter Thorium, the New Green Nuke. >> http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=287736 > >ROFL. Replace the natural world with the unnatural world. Thorium >doesn't exist in nature. Sorry, you must be thinking of one of the other popular radionuclides. Thorium is very popular in nature; it's a big component of some of the Florida sands. Handy for making gas mantles, vacuum tube filaments, etc. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Nuclear batteries.
chuckcar wrote: > > > > Ok, to be fair, everybody who said the US has no nuclear power was > > also incorrect.. > > > >> > Yes, that was *you* AFAIK. Misunderstanding my post. I never responded to a post of yours or said anything at all about you, Anything you perceive to be a misunderstanding must due to be something you hallucinated. > > Message-ID: > > > Your reply: > > Message-ID: > > > To a post where I talk about per capita usage and never mention > *anything* about lack or amount of US nuclear power. Nor did Mr. Meyer > ever state such. Mr Meyer claimed the US had no nuclear power. He seemed to later claim he was just echoing what someone else had already said as if that made it somehow correct. > > If you can give me a message ID showing someone else stating the US > has no nuclear power is this thread who you replied to, I of course will > retract the above. > There are plenty of basic NNTP newsreaders available. Get one and try to follow along. -jim > -- > (setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) ) |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Nuclear batteries.
|
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Nuclear batteries.
"E. Meyer" wrote: > > > > Mr Meyer claimed the US had no nuclear power. He seemed to later claim > > he was just echoing what someone else had already said as if that made > > it somehow correct. > > > > Mr. Meyer did NOT claim there US had no nuclear power. As usual you clip > the actual thread, state a complete untruth, then start throwing around BS. > This was the the entire content of the statement you made to which I responded: [quote] The reason the US doesn't have nuclear power now is Three Mile Island. The panic after that resulted a mountain of bureaucracy/red tape/expense that has stopped nuclear power in its tracks. [end quote] I responded that the US has more nuclear power than any other country. > I copied the actual thread into my comments including my response, yet you > insist on picking a comment out of context and running with it. I read the entire thread. Anyone else can too. >As this is > just one of many threads where you've done this, I can only conclude that > you are a troll. Are you requesting that, in the future, you be allowed to make false statements without contradiction? -jim > > > > > > >> > >> If you can give me a message ID showing someone else stating the US > >> has no nuclear power is this thread who you replied to, I of course will > >> retract the above. > >> > > > > There are plenty of basic NNTP newsreaders available. Get one and try > > to follow along. > > > > -jim > > > > > >> -- > >> (setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) ) |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Nuclear batteries.
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Nuclear batteries.
jim <"sjedgingN0Sp"@m@mwt,net> wrote in
: > > > chuckcar wrote: > >> > >> > Ok, to be fair, everybody who said the US has no nuclear power was >> > also incorrect.. >> > >> >> >> Yes, that was *you* AFAIK. Misunderstanding my post. > > I never responded to a post of yours or said anything at all > about you, Bull****. What the hell am I replying to? In addition: Message-ID: > Message-ID: > However I *did* find this post: Message-ID: > Ending with a Woosh (over your head) and no more posts from that name. Curious. Replying to a completely different nick. Who *absolutely* isn't you. > Anything you perceive to be a misunderstanding must due to be > something you hallucinated. >> No message ID's, no proof. -- (setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) ) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gel car batteries | observer | Corvette | 3 | May 2nd 08 11:58 PM |
Car Batteries. | [email protected] | Technology | 0 | March 19th 07 05:32 PM |
North Korea vs Australia - nuclear stress | Klarynxx | General | 0 | October 14th 06 01:03 PM |