If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"R. David Steele" /OMEGA> wrote in message
... > Why can't the US get Defender 90s, 110s and 130s? > > Why can't we have diesel powered Landies? > > And why doesn't the US military use the Defender as a basic, and > cheaper, vehicle for the average troops? Isn't it something to do with us building vehicles which aren't up to US safety specs? Initially I thought emissions, but then I thought perhaps not |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
R. David Steele wrote:
> Why can't the US get Defender 90s, 110s and 130s? The main problem is that LR and Ford's marketing dept have trouble seeing where they wouls fit in to the US market. They would be smaller than many US pick-ups but would be more expensive to buy. They do not have the comfort and luxury of a typical US pick-up and most of the market demands this. The sheer utility of a Defender and the off-road ability would of course be superior to most pick-ups but perhaps still not create a large enough market to make them viable. LR continually say the no longer sell Defenders in the US because of emmissions and passenger airbag issues - this of course is nonsense as they sell thousands of Discoverys with exactly the same engine and emmissions and fitting a passenger airbag is not beyond the engineering wit of Lode Lane either. On the upside, the US will definitely get the new Defender based on the T5 chassis in a few years, so you'll have to hang on. > > Why can't we have diesel powered Landies? > The two biggest problems are that US diesel is very porr quality with a high sulfur content and modern high-tech turbo-diesels won't swallow it. The other problem is that petrol is cheap and there in very little diesel-car culture in the states yet. It would however be great to drive a 30mpg TD5 in the states so you can tell all the tree-huggers who think you drive a gas-guzzling SUV to **** off! > And why doesn't the US military use the Defender as a basic, and > cheaper, vehicle for the average troops? Politically, it is very difficult for the US to procure non-domestic military kit. Even when the US military decided they must have British Harriers, the top brass had to lie to congress and leap through all sorts of hoops to make them look American before they could purchase them. Same thing with the British Chobham armour used on all abrams tanks. The US Rangers bought some special Defenders called RSOV but I doubt they will ever figure very highly. -- Julian --------- = Pretentious Sig required = |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
R. David Steele wrote:
> Why can't the US get Defender 90s, 110s and 130s? The main problem is that LR and Ford's marketing dept have trouble seeing where they wouls fit in to the US market. They would be smaller than many US pick-ups but would be more expensive to buy. They do not have the comfort and luxury of a typical US pick-up and most of the market demands this. The sheer utility of a Defender and the off-road ability would of course be superior to most pick-ups but perhaps still not create a large enough market to make them viable. LR continually say the no longer sell Defenders in the US because of emmissions and passenger airbag issues - this of course is nonsense as they sell thousands of Discoverys with exactly the same engine and emmissions and fitting a passenger airbag is not beyond the engineering wit of Lode Lane either. On the upside, the US will definitely get the new Defender based on the T5 chassis in a few years, so you'll have to hang on. > > Why can't we have diesel powered Landies? > The two biggest problems are that US diesel is very porr quality with a high sulfur content and modern high-tech turbo-diesels won't swallow it. The other problem is that petrol is cheap and there in very little diesel-car culture in the states yet. It would however be great to drive a 30mpg TD5 in the states so you can tell all the tree-huggers who think you drive a gas-guzzling SUV to **** off! > And why doesn't the US military use the Defender as a basic, and > cheaper, vehicle for the average troops? Politically, it is very difficult for the US to procure non-domestic military kit. Even when the US military decided they must have British Harriers, the top brass had to lie to congress and leap through all sorts of hoops to make them look American before they could purchase them. Same thing with the British Chobham armour used on all abrams tanks. The US Rangers bought some special Defenders called RSOV but I doubt they will ever figure very highly. -- Julian --------- = Pretentious Sig required = |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"R. David Steele" /OMEGA> wrote in message ... > Why can't the US get Defender 90s, 110s and 130s? > > Why can't we have diesel powered Landies? > > And why doesn't the US military use the Defender as a basic, and > cheaper, vehicle for the average troops? > Because they do not meet their minimum crash and rollover standards. Apparently they are good enough for us in the UK :-( This will change with the new utility range which is only a year to eighteen months from launch. Yippee! Huw --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.572 / Virus Database: 362 - Release Date: 27/01/04 |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"R. David Steele" /OMEGA> wrote in message ... > Why can't the US get Defender 90s, 110s and 130s? > > Why can't we have diesel powered Landies? > > And why doesn't the US military use the Defender as a basic, and > cheaper, vehicle for the average troops? > Because they do not meet their minimum crash and rollover standards. Apparently they are good enough for us in the UK :-( This will change with the new utility range which is only a year to eighteen months from launch. Yippee! Huw --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.572 / Virus Database: 362 - Release Date: 27/01/04 |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"R. David Steele" /OMEGA> wrote in message ... > Why can't the US get Defender 90s, 110s and 130s? don't meet US crash regs , don't have airbags .... > > Why can't we have diesel powered Landies? > all the engines have been too small for the US market i nthe past, also large cap V8s sell well enough no doubt there is some technicla hitch as well > And why doesn't the US military use the Defender as a basic, and > cheaper, vehicle for the average troops? > and admit defeat, it's rear USS forces don't use domestic products, and when they do they keep it specialised - however a lot of the non domestic kit used by US forces is British in origin and / or design --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.648 / Virus Database: 415 - Release Date: 31/03/2004 |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"R. David Steele" /OMEGA> wrote in message ... > Why can't the US get Defender 90s, 110s and 130s? don't meet US crash regs , don't have airbags .... > > Why can't we have diesel powered Landies? > all the engines have been too small for the US market i nthe past, also large cap V8s sell well enough no doubt there is some technicla hitch as well > And why doesn't the US military use the Defender as a basic, and > cheaper, vehicle for the average troops? > and admit defeat, it's rear USS forces don't use domestic products, and when they do they keep it specialised - however a lot of the non domestic kit used by US forces is British in origin and / or design --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.648 / Virus Database: 415 - Release Date: 31/03/2004 |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
the REAL A3 Sportback revealed | webmaster_audi4u | Audi | 1 | June 9th 04 09:06 PM |
I know that the rav4 is not a real 4x4, but we all got to start somewhere, right? | LovingPerson | 4x4 | 12 | January 14th 04 03:24 PM |
I know that rav4 is not a real 4x4 in terms of what real 4x4's are, but we all have to start some place, right? | LovingPerson | 4x4 | 2 | January 12th 04 11:34 AM |