If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Here's a secret for your VW Golf oil changes
If you are changing the oil filter its easier to do this from the top
instead of from the bottom like I had been doing it all along. Its still kind of a pain to work around all the hoses but its not so bad from the top. My car is a 2003 Golf with a 2.0 liter engine. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Tom Levigne" > wrote in message link.net... > If you are changing the oil filter Are there people that change the oil and NOT the filter? its easier to do this from the top > instead of from the bottom like I had been doing it all along. > Its still kind of a pain to work around all the hoses but its not so bad > from the top. > My car is a 2003 Golf with a 2.0 liter engine. > > Probably good advice for an A4 chassis, but on an A2 chassis its almost impossible to get at it from the top. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
In > Biz
wrote: > > "Tom Levigne" > wrote in message > link.net... >> If you are changing the oil filter > > Are there people that change the oil and NOT the filter? > > its easier to do this from the top >> instead of from the bottom like I had been doing it all along. >> Its still kind of a pain to work around all the hoses but its not so >> bad from the top. My car is a 2003 Golf with a 2.0 liter engine. >> I thought everyone did this. My 88 Golf, my 87 Jetta, and my 97 Jetta are all done from the top much more easily... >> > Probably good advice for an A4 chassis, but on an A2 chassis its > almost impossible to get at it from the top. Remind which chassis are which? I thought the Passat was the A4 and the Golf/Jetta the A3 Chad |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
> Remind which chassis are which? I thought the Passat was the A4 and the
> Golf/Jetta the A3 > > Chad Passats are B platform: to 81, B1 (Dasher in U.S.) 82 to 88, B2 (Quantum in U.S.) 89 to I don't know when, B3 I don't know when to present, B4 Golfs/Rabbits/Jettas are A platform: to 84, A1 85 to 92, A2 93 to 99? (mid model year for Jettas, right?) A3 99 to present, A4 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
> If you are changing the oil filter its easier to do this from the top
> instead of from the bottom like I had been doing it all along. > Its still kind of a pain to work around all the hoses but its not so bad > from the top. As long as we're on the topic, I've got something to get off my chest. 1. All oil filters should have a socket in the end that will accept a 3/8" ratchet drive. What would it take to weld one of those on to the filter can? Good grief. 2. Every car should accept an even number of quarts or liters of oil, depending on the units used in the particular country. When you change the oil, you should be able to put exactly four, five or six quarts in, whatever, and that's that. I've got half-full bottles of oil all over the place. Go ahead and try to give me one good reason why a car should take 4.4 quarts -- but I'm telling you right now, you ain't gonna convince me. If the engines took a standard amount of oil, then oil companies could package oil in that exact amount. One oil container, dump it in, and there you go. This should be obvious to engine designers. Good grief. 3. When the "low windshield washer" light comes on, that reservoir should take exactly one gallon to fill it. Why on earth do we have to have partially-filled containers of washer around? Light comes on, pull into station, put a gallon in, throw container away. Good grief. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Ed" > wrote in message ...
>> Remind which chassis are which? I thought the Passat was the A4 and the >> Golf/Jetta the A3 >> >> Chad > > Passats are B platform: > to 81, B1 (Dasher in U.S.) > 82 to 88, B2 (Quantum in U.S.) > 89 to I don't know when, B3 '90 to '94 are B3 although '89 too elsewhere (we just didn't get a Quantum/Passat for '89). > I don't know when to present, B4 '95-97 are B4 '98-early 2001 are B5 Mid 2001-now are B5.5 > Golfs/Rabbits/Jettas are A platform: > to 84, A1 > 85 to 92, A2 > 93 to 99? (mid model year for Jettas, right?) A3 And Golfs and GTIs (all three models got the mid year change but the Jetta was more obvious because it's the higher volume seller here, so early '99 for A3s and the A4 appeared a few months later to replace it. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Maybe you should try to order your oil from Canada, it comes in 1 Liter
and 4 Liter sizes up here On the other hand, since all the major companies sell to both Canada and the US, maybe you could convince your local distributer to order the metric sizes from the oil companies. Will Brian Running wrote: >>If you are changing the oil filter its easier to do this from the top >>instead of from the bottom like I had been doing it all along. >>Its still kind of a pain to work around all the hoses but its not so bad >>from the top. > > > As long as we're on the topic, I've got something to get off my chest. > > 1. All oil filters should have a socket in the end that will accept a > 3/8" ratchet drive. What would it take to weld one of those on to the > filter can? Good grief. > > 2. Every car should accept an even number of quarts or liters of oil, > depending on the units used in the particular country. When you change the > oil, you should be able to put exactly four, five or six quarts in, > whatever, and that's that. I've got half-full bottles of oil all over the > place. Go ahead and try to give me one good reason why a car should take > 4.4 quarts -- but I'm telling you right now, you ain't gonna convince me. > If the engines took a standard amount of oil, then oil companies could > package oil in that exact amount. One oil container, dump it in, and there > you go. This should be obvious to engine designers. Good grief. > > 3. When the "low windshield washer" light comes on, that reservoir should > take exactly one gallon to fill it. Why on earth do we have to have > partially-filled containers of washer around? Light comes on, pull into > station, put a gallon in, throw container away. Good grief. > > |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
That windsheild washer thing really bugs me... Our Volvo holds 4 litres + a
little extra, it's marked 4L on the resevoir.... so a US Gallon fits, a UK Gallon fits, and a 4L jug fits.... What does my VW have - 3L... Meaning I have little bits left in every bottle - I think the old A2 Golf's had 4L tho. In the winter I've had up to 3-4 washer jugs strapped in with bungie cords. "Brian Running" > wrote in message m... >> If you are changing the oil filter its easier to do this from the top >> instead of from the bottom like I had been doing it all along. >> Its still kind of a pain to work around all the hoses but its not so bad >> from the top. > > As long as we're on the topic, I've got something to get off my chest. > > 1. All oil filters should have a socket in the end that will accept a > 3/8" ratchet drive. What would it take to weld one of those on to the > filter can? Good grief. > > 2. Every car should accept an even number of quarts or liters of oil, > depending on the units used in the particular country. When you change > the > oil, you should be able to put exactly four, five or six quarts in, > whatever, and that's that. I've got half-full bottles of oil all over the > place. Go ahead and try to give me one good reason why a car should take > 4.4 quarts -- but I'm telling you right now, you ain't gonna convince me. > If the engines took a standard amount of oil, then oil companies could > package oil in that exact amount. One oil container, dump it in, and > there > you go. This should be obvious to engine designers. Good grief. > > 3. When the "low windshield washer" light comes on, that reservoir > should > take exactly one gallon to fill it. Why on earth do we have to have > partially-filled containers of washer around? Light comes on, pull into > station, put a gallon in, throw container away. Good grief. > > |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Brian Running wrote:
>>If you are changing the oil filter its easier to do this from the top >>instead of from the bottom like I had been doing it all along. >>Its still kind of a pain to work around all the hoses but its not so bad >>from the top. > > > As long as we're on the topic, I've got something to get off my chest. > OK, I am prepared. > 1. All oil filters should have a socket in the end that will accept a > 3/8" ratchet drive. What would it take to weld one of those on to the > filter can? Good grief. > Phooyee. Oil Filters should be put on, and therefore come off again BY HAND. Lube the new filter seal with some fresh oil and crank it about one quarter to a half turn past contact. Why people put filters one like axle nuts is beyond me. Same with using an air wrench to torque lug nuts. wtf. > 2. Every car should accept an even number of quarts or liters of oil, > depending on the units used in the particular country. When you change the > oil, you should be able to put exactly four, five or six quarts in, > whatever, and that's that. I've got half-full bottles of oil all over the > place. Go ahead and try to give me one good reason why a car should take > 4.4 quarts -- but I'm telling you right now, you ain't gonna convince me. > If the engines took a standard amount of oil, then oil companies could > package oil in that exact amount. One oil container, dump it in, and there > you go. This should be obvious to engine designers. Good grief. > Here you have a point; even if it was a metric amount. The 'additional amount' could be incorporated into the oil pan pretty reasonable, if not some where else. Still the reason you have half full oil containers around isn't the fault of designers. This situation shouldn't exist past two oil changes, it seems to me. (Old school tech meant the remainder would go towards intermittent topping off. One could hope a modern engine wouldn't _need_ topping off between oil changes). > 3. When the "low windshield washer" light comes on, that reservoir should > take exactly one gallon to fill it. Why on earth do we have to have > partially-filled containers of washer around? Light comes on, pull into > station, put a gallon in, throw container away. Good grief. > > Now you're just whining man. 8D TBerk |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
T > wrote:
>Brian Running wrote: >>>If you are changing the oil filter its easier to do this from the top >>>instead of from the bottom like I had been doing it all along. >>>Its still kind of a pain to work around all the hoses but its not so bad >>>from the top. >> >> >> As long as we're on the topic, I've got something to get off my chest. >> > >OK, I am prepared. > > >> 1. All oil filters should have a socket in the end that will accept a >> 3/8" ratchet drive. What would it take to weld one of those on to the >> filter can? Good grief. >> > It akes money to put something on that nearly no one should have to use. Hand tight, hand loosen or a simple strap wrench. >Phooyee. Oil Filters should be put on, and therefore come off again BY >HAND. Lube the new filter seal with some fresh oil and crank it about >one quarter to a half turn past contact. Why people put filters one like > axle nuts is beyond me. Same with using an air wrench to torque lug >nuts. wtf. > > >> 2. Every car should accept an even number of quarts or liters of oil, >> depending on the units used in the particular country. When you change the >> oil, you should be able to put exactly four, five or six quarts in, >> whatever, and that's that. I've got half-full bottles of oil all over the >> place. Go ahead and try to give me one good reason why a car should take >> 4.4 quarts -- but I'm telling you right now, you ain't gonna convince me. >> If the engines took a standard amount of oil, then oil companies could >> package oil in that exact amount. One oil container, dump it in, and there >> you go. This should be obvious to engine designers. Good grief. >> > >Here you have a point; even if it was a metric amount. The 'additional >amount' could be incorporated into the oil pan pretty reasonable, if not >some where else. Still the reason you have half full oil containers >around isn't the fault of designers. This situation shouldn't exist past >two oil changes, it seems to me. (Old school tech meant the remainder >would go towards intermittent topping off. One could hope a modern >engine wouldn't _need_ topping off between oil changes). You pint is not my pint. Your liter is not my quart. Your galon is not my gallon. Your kg is not my lb is not my stone. The world does not measure things the same. Oil capacity is designed with a few factors. Enough oil to do the job and chassis space are the two primary factors. Not designed for Jo Dufus who cannot use the pint of oil to top off the engine at the half oil change top off, or top of the lawn mower which always uses oil, or as mentioned use it for the next oil change or the next change after that. Heck I buy the gallon. I use 1 gallon plus some. That not full one gallon jug gets used for the next few oil changes. It does not feel lonely sitting on the oil shelf with the other 2 or three gallons. Well it does now as I used my last full gallon and there sits the partial container for another few months. > > >> 3. When the "low windshield washer" light comes on, that reservoir should >> take exactly one gallon to fill it. Why on earth do we have to have >> partially-filled containers of washer around? Light comes on, pull into >> station, put a gallon in, throw container away. Good grief. I can show you a shelf full of partial cans. It takes 41 US ounces of laquer thinner to clean the spary gun. Why don't they sell 41 oz. cans? >> >> > >Now you're just whining man. 8D Great troll! Fun to respond to your stuff. Is it Mad TV or was it SNL that had the old lady who went off on stuff and at the end of the skit went Oh. > > >TBerk Jim B. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Golf carb tuning?/ cutting out | Jason Fox | VW air cooled | 0 | December 29th 04 05:24 PM |
Golf vs. GTI | dmkozak | VW water cooled | 15 | October 9th 04 08:25 PM |
2 Door Golf TDI | Mr.Eddy | VW water cooled | 12 | October 8th 04 01:03 AM |
Shifter rod damaged on Golf? | Keith Murphy | VW water cooled | 7 | October 5th 04 04:02 PM |