Chysler hires murderer to shill it's cars

wrote:

>
> Considering Dubya started a war based completely on two false pieces
> of evidence (weaps of mass destruction and links to Al Qaeda), IO would
> say he is just as likely to be accused of murder as some other people.

Ok, ya know HankWB, This has zero to do with the group or the
thread. And more importantly WMDs were already found along with Russian
fighter buried in the sand, and EVERYthing was linked to al qaeda. If
you don't like it, Move to Iraq and live with the ones you so dearly
love. I'm sick of hearing all the pansy excuses for not removing a
murderer who BROK the treaty that he signed at the end of his loss after
the Kuwait invasion.

--

"Gullible is a misdemeanor - stupid is a felony...
clueless gets you committed..." - JG

WindsorFox[SS] wrote:
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Considering Dubya started a war based completely on two false
>> pieces of evidence (weaps of mass destruction and links to Al Qaeda),
>> IO would say he is just as likely to be accused of murder as some
>> other people.
>
>
> Ok, ya know HankWB, This has zero to do with the group or the
> thread. And more importantly WMDs were already found along with Russian
> fighter buried in the sand, and EVERYthing was linked to al qaeda.

Wow! I hadn't heard that! Any references?

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

"WindsorFox[SS]" > wrote in message
newsZTKe.125$ej5.124@lakeread05...
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Considering Dubya started a war based completely on two false pieces
> > of evidence (weaps of mass destruction and links to Al Qaeda), IO would
> > say he is just as likely to be accused of murder as some other people.
>
> Ok, ya know HankWB, This has zero to do with the group or the
> thread. And more importantly WMDs were already found along with Russian
> fighter buried in the sand, and EVERYthing was linked to al qaeda.

I'm sure Shrubbie would be interested in your sources, since he has already
admitted publicly that there were no WMD's found.

Dave

rw wrote:
> WindsorFox[SS] wrote:
>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Considering Dubya started a war based completely on two false
>>> pieces of evidence (weaps of mass destruction and links to Al Qaeda),
>>> IO would say he is just as likely to be accused of murder as some
>>> other people.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ok, ya know HankWB, This has zero to do with the group or the
>> thread. And more importantly WMDs were already found along with
>> Russian fighter buried in the sand, and EVERYthing was linked to al
>> qaeda.
>
>
> Wow! I hadn't heard that! Any references?
>

Do a search. Chemicals were found but just a small amount and there
were pictures of the Russian planes being un covered. Pictures you
certainly wouldn't see from Dan Rather or Peter Jennings. Anyway, this
is over. I'm not getting roped into another kook debate about how W is a
murderer. With that thinking we should have no right to go into Germany
in WW2 since it was Japan that attacked us.

--

"Gullible is a misdemeanor - stupid is a felony...
clueless gets you committed..." - JG

"Hairy" > wrote in
:

>
> "WindsorFox[SS]" > wrote in message
> newsZTKe.125$ej5.124@lakeread05...
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Considering Dubya started a war based completely on two false
>> > pieces
>> > of evidence (weaps of mass destruction and links to Al Qaeda), IO
>> > would say he is just as likely to be accused of murder as some
>> > other people.
>>
>> Ok, ya know HankWB, This has zero to do with the group or the
>> thread. And more importantly WMDs were already found along with
>> Russian fighter buried in the sand, and EVERYthing was linked to al
>> qaeda.
>
> I'm sure Shrubbie would be interested in your sources, since he has
> already admitted publicly that there were no WMD's found.
>
> Dave
>
>

I suppose you would like me to post the quotes from Clinton, Kennedy, Kerry
and Chirac about the WMD's being there?

And if Dubya knew there werent any, why didnt we "find them"

Research saddam, his paranoia, and street-wise cunning... and use some
common sense!

I hate Ostriches!

WindsorFox[SS] wrote:
> rw wrote:
>
>> WindsorFox[SS] wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Ok, ya know HankWB, This has zero to do with the group or the
>>> thread. And more importantly WMDs were already found along with
>>> Russian fighter buried in the sand, and EVERYthing was linked to al
>>> qaeda.
>>
>>
>>
>> Wow! I hadn't heard that! Any references?
>>
>
> Do a search. Chemicals were found but just a small amount and there
> were pictures of the Russian planes being un covered. Pictures you
> certainly wouldn't see from Dan Rather or Peter Jennings. Anyway, this
> is over. I'm not getting roped into another kook debate about how W is a
> murderer. With that thinking we should have no right to go into Germany
> in WW2 since it was Japan that attacked us.


In other words, you have no references.

On the other hand, the Duelfer report, which was commissioned by the CIA
(not Dan Rather or Peter Jennings), states that Saddam Hussein did not
possess stockpiles of illicit weapons at the time of the U.S. invasion
in March 2003 and had not begun any program to produce them. The report
states that Iraq's WMD program was essentially destroyed in 1991 and
Saddam ended Iraq's nuclear program after the 1991 Gulf War.

Pass the Kool Aid.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

rw > wrote in
m:


> In other words, you have no references.
>
> On the other hand, the Duelfer report, which was commissioned by the
> CIA (not Dan Rather or Peter Jennings), states that Saddam Hussein did
> not possess stockpiles of illicit weapons at the time of the U.S.
> invasion in March 2003 and had not begun any program to produce them.
> The report states that Iraq's WMD program was essentially destroyed in
> 1991 and Saddam ended Iraq's nuclear program after the 1991 Gulf War.
>
> Pass the Kool Aid.
>

READ the WHOLE thing, freaking parsing butthole... of course that is
inconvenient for your side of it!

Backyard Mechanic > wrote in
:

> rw > wrote in
> m:
>
>
>> In other words, you have no references.
>>
>> On the other hand, the Duelfer report, which was commissioned by the
>> CIA (not Dan Rather or Peter Jennings), states that Saddam Hussein did
>> not possess stockpiles of illicit weapons at the time of the U.S.
>> invasion in March 2003 and had not begun any program to produce them.
>> The report states that Iraq's WMD program was essentially destroyed in
>> 1991 and Saddam ended Iraq's nuclear program after the 1991 Gulf War.
>>
>> Pass the Kool Aid.
>>
>
> READ the WHOLE thing, freaking parsing butthole... of course that is
> inconvenient for your side of it!
>

http://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_...ne_Events.html

Answer THAT or just shut the f$%% up!

Backyard Mechanic wrote:
>
> http://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_...ne_Events.html
>
> Answer THAT or just shut the f$%% up!

It basically says that the inspections were working. And now we're at
1846 US combat fatalities, about ten times as many wounded, and counting.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

rw > wrote in news:42fcbf85$0$11073
:

> Backyard Mechanic wrote:
>>
>> http://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_...ne_Events.html
>>
>> Answer THAT or just shut the f$%% up!
>
> It basically says that the inspections were working. And now we're at
> 1846 US combat fatalities, about ten times as many wounded, and counting.
>

yeah, sure it does... see below - and i'm sure glad you ahve some body
count to make you feel righteous.