If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
URGENT: Tell your Senator's to Oppose HR418 - The Real ID Act
Hello privacy advocates and fellow motorists. We need to make it LOUD
and CLEAR that many people oppose HR418 - The Real ID Act of 2005. We need to ask our Senators to strip out the driver's license provisions in the bill when it rides over to the Senate on top of a spending bill such as Iraq war funding. We need to ask the Senate to insist these Driver License provisions are stripped when dealing with the House ! The part to oppose the most is the mandate that states must sign the "Driver License Agreement" (DLA). When the bill was passed by the House, there was no committee scrutiny or markup. When amendments were offered to limit the databases such as not allowing information pertaining to citizens using their rights such as 1st, 2nd, and 14 amendment rights, it was VOTED DOWN ! Some people will rant and scream that disagreeing with this is unpatriotic but this bill is unpatriotic ! Here is a part of a speech from Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX), who is the head of "The Liberty Committee". It can be found at URL http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/co...5/cr020905.htm Here are excerpts below : This bill establishes a massive, centrally-coordinated database of highly personal information about American citizens: at a minimum their name, date of birth, place of residence, Social Security number, and physical and possibly other characteristics. What is even more disturbing is that, by mandating that states participate in the "Drivers License Agreement," this bill creates a massive database of sensitive information on American citizens that will be shared with Canada and Mexico! |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Uh,
We don't have any senators of worth up here in Canada(including the lowly hockey sens) and was wondering if I could help anyways. Let me know Tec > wrote in message om... > Hello privacy advocates and fellow motorists. We need to make it LOUD > and CLEAR that many people oppose HR418 - The Real ID Act of 2005. We > need to ask our Senators to strip out the driver's license provisions > in the bill when it rides over to the Senate on top of a spending bill > such as Iraq war funding. We need to ask the Senate to insist these > Driver License provisions are stripped when dealing with the House ! > > The part to oppose the most is the mandate that states must sign the > "Driver License Agreement" (DLA). > > When the bill was passed by the House, there was no committee scrutiny > or markup. When amendments were offered to limit the databases such as > not allowing information pertaining to citizens using their rights > such as 1st, 2nd, and 14 amendment rights, it was VOTED DOWN ! > > Some people will rant and scream that disagreeing with this is > unpatriotic but this bill is unpatriotic ! > > Here is a part of a speech from Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX), who is the head > of "The Liberty Committee". It can be found at URL > http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/co...5/cr020905.htm > > Here are excerpts below : > > This bill establishes a massive, centrally-coordinated database of > highly personal information about American citizens: at a minimum > their name, date of birth, place of residence, Social Security number, > and physical and possibly other characteristics. What is even more > disturbing is that, by mandating that states participate in the > "Drivers License Agreement," this bill creates a massive database of > sensitive information on American citizens that will be shared with > Canada and Mexico! > . > . > . > There are no limits on what happens to the database of sensitive > information on Americans once it leaves the United States for Canada > and Mexico - or perhaps other countries. Who is to stop a corrupt > foreign government official from selling or giving this information to > human traffickers or even terrorists? Will this uncertainty make us > feel safer? > . > . > . > Although Congress funded an additional 2,000 border guards last year, > the administration has announced that it will only ask for an > additional 210 guards. Why are we not pursuing these avenues as a way > of safeguarding our country? Why are we punishing Americans by taking > away their freedoms instead of making life more difficult for those > who would enter our country illegally? > > H.R. 418 does what legislation restricting firearm ownership does. It > punishes law-abiding citizens. Criminals will ignore it. H.R. 418 > offers us a false sense of greater security at the cost of taking a > gigantic step toward making America a police state. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|