Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! ___________mixqec

linda wrote:
> Steve Bigelow wrote:
>> "Big Bill" > wrote in message
>> news >>
>>>> Honestly, I did not realize that there were so many duke fans, and
>>>> again as stated, I admitted, i did not find any site to support a
>>>> claim that our beloved duke was *OMG* gay.....
>>>
>>> Are you *really* that naive? Or just that young?
>>> Sure, you posted that thinking, "No one here knows who The Duke is,
>>> so I can say whatever I want, and no one will even think twice
>>> about it." This is Usenet. if you don't understand it, lurk for a
>>> while.
>>> Primary rule: never post without some idea of how to defend what you
>>> say. Especially when you malign an ICON.
>>
>>
>> Malign?
>> How? Is being gay still a big deal in the US?
>>
> also, i would like to interject: is it against the *rules* to be Gay
> and an ICON?

linda wrote:
> Steve Bigelow wrote:
>> "Big Bill" > wrote in message
>> news >>
>>>> Honestly, I did not realize that there were so many duke fans, and
>>>> again as stated, I admitted, i did not find any site to support a
>>>> claim that our beloved duke was *OMG* gay.....
>>>
>>> Are you *really* that naive? Or just that young?
>>> Sure, you posted that thinking, "No one here knows who The Duke is,
>>> so I can say whatever I want, and no one will even think twice
>>> about it." This is Usenet. if you don't understand it, lurk for a
>>> while.
>>> Primary rule: never post without some idea of how to defend what you
>>> say. Especially when you malign an ICON.
>>
>>
>> Malign?
>> How? Is being gay still a big deal in the US?
>>
> also, i would like to interject: is it against the *rules* to be Gay
> and an ICON?

We are currently experiencing intermittent problems receiving external
mail. We have corrected the problem, but the changes will not take effect
until replication to external sources completes. If you have not received
messages, please have the sender resend the message to ensure delivery.


"Geoff" > wrote in message
icas.hpqcorp.net...
>
>
> linda wrote:
>
>> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:22:34 GMT
>> From: linda >
>> Newsgroups: rec.autos.makers.chrysler
>> Subject: Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!!
>> ___________ mixqec
>>
>> next you will be calling me a gay man in a woman's body!!!!!
>
> An interesting non-sequiter. What, pray tell, gave you this idea?
>
>>
>> my self esteem is just fine, thank you... as for your self esteem, i
>> think it is overblown (inflated).....
>>
>
> Just calling it like I see it, ma'am. By the way, I wasn't referring to
> your self-esteem (which is also apparently low) but rather your
> self-image, quite a different thing entirely. Perhaps you ought to learn
> the difference
> between the two before you rather hamfistedly go about making
> accusations of egotism. Might I suggest http://www.dictionary.com?
> Fortunately, no capitalization skills are required to use that site.
>
> Fondly,
> --Geoff
>
>>
>> Geoff wrote:
>> >
>> > linda wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >>Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:03:12 GMT
>> >>From: linda >
>> >>Newsgroups: rec.autos.makers.chrysler
>> >>Subject: Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!!
>> >> ___________ mixqec
>> >>
>> >>Your posting only backs up my statements...
>> >>
>> >>i stand by this: i still think IT is cute that you are still defending
>> >>our national hero (a man who married ONLY latino women)... i have also
>> >>stated that i cannot find any internet cites to back up my claim.. i
>> >>don't think i could ever presume that one statement (to which i have
>> >>repeatedly stated, YOU ARE RIGHT!, i cannot find a site to back up my
>> >>assumption) would ever RE-WRITE the history of someone who is so
>> >>revered.
>> >>
>> >>as for saying i am not smart, well... apparently i was smart enough to
>> >>invoke some reaction out of a guy who has better things to read....
>> >>
>> >>as for you being a *******, well, i can't respond, i only have your
>> >>postings to back up that claim....and if i can't find sites or proper
>> >>documentation, then i can't prove it.....
>> >>
>> >>as for you and i ever meeting, you would undoubtedly never find me
>> >>appealing, thank God........
>> >>
>> >>Chaos, panic and disorder. My work here is done
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > The only panic I note in this thread is in your retreat amid your
>> > "stand(ing) by" something not essential to your original claim.
>> > Perhaps
>> > you're trying to save some last remaining vestige of your dignity.
>> >
>> > As to your apparent certainty that I wouldn't find you appealing: I'm
>> > sorry to see you have such a poor self-image. What a shame. These
>> > things can be addressed by a good psychotherapist, perhaps you ought to
>> > consider seeing one.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > --Geoff
>>

We are currently experiencing intermittent problems receiving external
mail. We have corrected the problem, but the changes will not take effect
until replication to external sources completes. If you have not received
messages, please have the sender resend the message to ensure delivery.


"Geoff" > wrote in message
icas.hpqcorp.net...
>
>
> linda wrote:
>
>> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:22:34 GMT
>> From: linda >
>> Newsgroups: rec.autos.makers.chrysler
>> Subject: Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!!
>> ___________ mixqec
>>
>> next you will be calling me a gay man in a woman's body!!!!!
>
> An interesting non-sequiter. What, pray tell, gave you this idea?
>
>>
>> my self esteem is just fine, thank you... as for your self esteem, i
>> think it is overblown (inflated).....
>>
>
> Just calling it like I see it, ma'am. By the way, I wasn't referring to
> your self-esteem (which is also apparently low) but rather your
> self-image, quite a different thing entirely. Perhaps you ought to learn
> the difference
> between the two before you rather hamfistedly go about making
> accusations of egotism. Might I suggest http://www.dictionary.com?
> Fortunately, no capitalization skills are required to use that site.
>
> Fondly,
> --Geoff
>
>>
>> Geoff wrote:
>> >
>> > linda wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >>Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:03:12 GMT
>> >>From: linda >
>> >>Newsgroups: rec.autos.makers.chrysler
>> >>Subject: Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!!
>> >> ___________ mixqec
>> >>
>> >>Your posting only backs up my statements...
>> >>
>> >>i stand by this: i still think IT is cute that you are still defending
>> >>our national hero (a man who married ONLY latino women)... i have also
>> >>stated that i cannot find any internet cites to back up my claim.. i
>> >>don't think i could ever presume that one statement (to which i have
>> >>repeatedly stated, YOU ARE RIGHT!, i cannot find a site to back up my
>> >>assumption) would ever RE-WRITE the history of someone who is so
>> >>revered.
>> >>
>> >>as for saying i am not smart, well... apparently i was smart enough to
>> >>invoke some reaction out of a guy who has better things to read....
>> >>
>> >>as for you being a *******, well, i can't respond, i only have your
>> >>postings to back up that claim....and if i can't find sites or proper
>> >>documentation, then i can't prove it.....
>> >>
>> >>as for you and i ever meeting, you would undoubtedly never find me
>> >>appealing, thank God........
>> >>
>> >>Chaos, panic and disorder. My work here is done
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > The only panic I note in this thread is in your retreat amid your
>> > "stand(ing) by" something not essential to your original claim.
>> > Perhaps
>> > you're trying to save some last remaining vestige of your dignity.
>> >
>> > As to your apparent certainty that I wouldn't find you appealing: I'm
>> > sorry to see you have such a poor self-image. What a shame. These
>> > things can be addressed by a good psychotherapist, perhaps you ought to
>> > consider seeing one.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > --Geoff
>>