If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Sillyspeed...
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 13:21:37 +0000, Catman
> wrote: >So I think you two have had bad ones Not sure if *bad* is the right word, more *lacking in stamina* in my case. Mine was excellent for just over 7 years. In fact, the best car I've ever owned (for reliability). -- Z Scotland Alfa Romeo 156 2.4JTD Veloce Leather 'Oil' be seeing you.. (Email must have the word 'Alfa' in the subject line to get through auto-filtering) |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Sillyspeed...
"SteveH" > wrote in message ... > Dave Savage > wrote: > > > I'm not entirely sure what to do next, really - very tempted to flog the > Sillyspeed when we get it back and do the 2.4JTD thing - manual gearbox > and the less pretty facelift body. But it would have to be a Sportwagon > again. Or possibly a late 147. > > A GT would be ideal, if the boot wasn't a boot, but was a hatch. That > was a missed opportunity from Alfa, IMHO. > -- > SteveH In your shoes I'd be tempted to go for anything with a manual box - I always reckoned that Sillyspeed was just another thing to go wrong. No doubt I'll now be flooded with folks telling me that Selespeed is the greatest thing since spaghetti (they don't do sliced bread in Italy) !! Dave S.... |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Sillyspeed...
Ivan wrote:
> "SteveH" > wrote in message > ... >> Dave Savage > wrote: >> >> >> A GT would be ideal, if the boot wasn't a boot, but was a hatch. That >> was a missed opportunity from Alfa, IMHO. > > I think you will find the GT has a hatch! Well at least mine has... unless > it *should* be a boot but mine has some serious manufacturing defect! But do your seats fold down? SteveH: Angle Grinder? -- Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3 Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply) 116 Giulietta 3.0l Sprint 1.7 GTV TS 156 V6 2.5 S2 Triumph Sprint ST 1050: It's blue, see. www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Sillyspeed...
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 11:43:27 +0000, Catman
> wrote: >> Duff bonnet catches (remind me somebody what year approx this started >> happening, it was a few years into the production run) . > >Don't recall that one. It was an official recall on my 2001 model. The *fix* was to vomit grease all over it. Problem was that the catch could stick and not hold properly although it had appeared to. At speed, the bonnet could open and wrap itself round the windscreen. I heard of one case several years ago just before the recall. Quite a few manufacturers have suffered this particular embarrassment. -- Z Scotland Alfa Romeo 156 2.4JTD Veloce Leather 'Oil' be seeing you.. (Email must have the word 'Alfa' in the subject line to get through auto-filtering) |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Sillyspeed...
"Zathras" > wrote in message ... > On Fri, 4 Dec 2009 12:49:50 -0000, "Dave Savage" > > wrote: > >>Shame, my petrol 156 is 11years old and 80,000 miles. Given my recent >>experiences, I was going to give it to you (fellow Scot, we need to stick >>together). > > As a Lloyds shareholder, I no longer have the ability to fund the Alfa > lifestyle! But thanks anyway.. > >>Instead, I guess I'll have to keep it. > > ..or..investigate the scrappage scheme.. > On the case already with that one. Dave S.... > -- > Z > Scotland > Alfa Romeo 156 2.4JTD Veloce Leather > 'Oil' be seeing you.. > (Email must have the word 'Alfa' in the > subject line to get through auto-filtering) |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Sillyspeed...
Zathras wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 11:43:27 +0000, Catman > > wrote: > >>> Duff bonnet catches (remind me somebody what year approx this started >>> happening, it was a few years into the production run) . >> Don't recall that one. > > It was an official recall on my 2001 model. The *fix* was to vomit > grease all over it. Problem was that the catch could stick and not > hold properly although it had appeared to. At speed, the bonnet could > open and wrap itself round the windscreen. I heard of one case several > years ago just before the recall. Quite a few manufacturers have > suffered this particular embarrassment. > OOooooh. Yes I had that on the last one. Just made sure I shut the bloody thing. -- Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3 Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply) 116 Giulietta 3.0l Sprint 1.7 GTV TS 156 V6 2.5 S2 Triumph Sprint ST 1050: It's blue, see. www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Sillyspeed...
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009 14:18:03 -0000, "Dave Savage"
> wrote: >An odd "positive" : it's still on the original exhaust ! Aren't they all! >A couple of negatives : > >The suspension is poor (choppy / jiggly) - I've always wondered if this is >down to UK roads (maybe Italian roads are smoother). Nah. The words you're looking for are "body control is f***ing sh!t". I don't like to do comparisons here with my current mule but I'll make an exception as it's helpful to explain my point. I have an E90 BMW 3 series with M-Sport suspension and vast run-flat tyres on massive alloys. It's the hardest, noisiest setup you could ever imagine on a road car. It's much jigglier and harder than the Veloce 156 and violently throws the occupants about on undulating surfaces. So it's worse than the 156 then? ..er..no. Why? The *body control* is stunning in comparison to a 156. The beemer follows the road undulations perfectly (as do the occupants!) and never looses it's composure over less than perfect roads. The occupants are punished but I think the car would be twice as quick as my 156 over certain roads. On the other hand, the 156 is a lot gentler on the occupants but the front end was *totally* bewildered by undulating roads. The number of times I had to slow down to protect the bottom of the car from damage while, frankly, rubbish cars overtook was astonishing. It was all very well known and you could get kits to improve things (e.g. Harvey-Bailey). The awfulness of the 156 body control is put into sharp context when everybody who has been in my 156 and has now been in the BMW has said it's more comfortable!! I say "how is that possible in a car that's widely criticised for it's harsh ride?" - the conclusion is that if you must have a car with a "sporty" ride quality, it's got to have decent body control to be comfortable. Sporty ride quality and naff body control simply isn't as good. >A couple of years >back, I was doing a long daily commute (90 miles each way) and had the use >of a Vectra. I used both cars regularly on the same route, and found the >Vectra much more sure-footed Thou art excommunicated..burn in hell, devil spawn! 8-0 >(on some parts of the route, the Alfa felt >positively dangerous !). > >The electrics are "quirky" (aircon has a mind of its own / central locking >plays up occasionally / loose connection somewhere to the radio speakers, >often cured by twiddling the electric window controls !). Mine were fine except the bulb failure system didn't work. I considered this a plus.. >Rattle in the dashboard in the cold (ah, that old chestnut !). ...but you could tell what the outside temp was with your ears and without looking at the dash! ;-) -- Z Scotland Alfa Romeo 156 2.4JTD Veloce Leather 'Oil' be seeing you.. (Email must have the word 'Alfa' in the subject line to get through auto-filtering) |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Sillyspeed...
Ivan > wrote:
> "SteveH" > wrote in message > ... > > Dave Savage > wrote: > > > > > > A GT would be ideal, if the boot wasn't a boot, but was a hatch. That > > was a missed opportunity from Alfa, IMHO. > > I think you will find the GT has a hatch! Well at least mine has... unless > it *should* be a boot but mine has some serious manufacturing defect! Oh, right.... I thought they were a saloon type coupe. -- SteveH |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Sillyspeed...
"Catman" > wrote in message ... > Ivan wrote: >> "SteveH" > wrote in message >> ... >>> Dave Savage > wrote: >>> >>> >>> A GT would be ideal, if the boot wasn't a boot, but was a hatch. That >>> was a missed opportunity from Alfa, IMHO. >> >> I think you will find the GT has a hatch! Well at least mine has... >> unless it *should* be a boot but mine has some serious manufacturing >> defect! > > But do your seats fold down? > > SteveH: Angle Grinder? > > Yes they do.. and they fold 60/40 too.. Just took some snaps so you can see http://www.btinternet.com/~g1ygd/AlfaGT/ -- Ivan. Alfa GT Ex 156 2.5 V6 Veloce Ex 156 Selespeed (RIP 22 May 03) Ex 145 QV Ex 33 16v QV Ex 33 QV series 1 __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4661 (20091204) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Sillyspeed...
Ivan > wrote:
> > But do your seats fold down? > > > > SteveH: Angle Grinder? > > > > > Yes they do.. and they fold 60/40 too.. Just took some snaps so you can see > http://www.btinternet.com/~g1ygd/AlfaGT/ I was convinced I'd seen a photo of one where the boot opened saloon style. <fires up autotrader> -- SteveH |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unavailable Sillyspeed Part | [email protected] | Alfa Romeo | 10 | July 6th 05 10:47 AM |