OT Eminent Domain

click on link http://www.freenation.tv/hotellostliberty2.html

On 28 Jun 2005 15:30:25 -0700, "Bill Berckman"
> wrote:

>click on link http://www.freenation.tv/hotellostliberty2.html

Hosea 8:7.

That story was released a late last week.

The jist is that the supreme court ruled that a local/state government could
claim emminent domain for the purpose of (promoting private construction)
projects that would enhance the local/state taxes.

fyi: I dont agree with that ruling.

"Bill Berckman" > wrote in message
oups.com...
> click on link http://www.freenation.tv/hotellostliberty2.html
>

On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:09:49 -0400, "Funkie" >
wrote:

>That story was released a late last week.
>
>The jist is that the supreme court ruled that a local/state government could
>claim emminent domain for the purpose of (promoting private construction)
>projects that would enhance the local/state taxes.

That's not the gist of the link he posted. Read it again. Instant
Karma... is gonna get him.

>
>fyi: I dont agree with that ruling.
>
>"Bill Berckman" > wrote in message
roups.com...
>> click on link http://www.freenation.tv/hotellostliberty2.html
>>
>

On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:15:29 GMT, Shag >
wrote:

>On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:09:49 -0400, "Funkie" >
>wrote:
>
>>That story was released a late last week.
>>
>>The jist is that the supreme court ruled that a local/state government could
>>claim emminent domain for the purpose of (promoting private construction)
>>projects that would enhance the local/state taxes.
>
>That's not the gist of the link he posted. Read it again. Instant
>Karma... is gonna get him.
>
>>
>>fyi: I dont agree with that ruling.

ps- I think anybody who *does* agree with the ruling in question
shoudl be tazered. Repeatedly. I volunteer. :-)

>>
>>"Bill Berckman" > wrote in message
groups.com...
>>> click on link http://www.freenation.tv/hotellostliberty2.html
>>>
>>

And this is exactly how to fix this problem. Just need to figure out where
the others who voted for this crap live. Great story. Thanks!
Andy

"Shag" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:09:49 -0400, "Funkie" >
> wrote:
>
> >That story was released a late last week.
> >
> >The jist is that the supreme court ruled that a local/state government
could
> >claim emminent domain for the purpose of (promoting private construction)
> >projects that would enhance the local/state taxes.
>
> That's not the gist of the link he posted. Read it again. Instant
> Karma... is gonna get him.
>
> >
> >fyi: I dont agree with that ruling.
> >
> >"Bill Berckman" > wrote in message
> roups.com...
> >> click on link http://www.freenation.tv/hotellostliberty2.html
> >>
> >
>

> wrote in message
m...
> And this is exactly how to fix this problem. Just need to figure out where
> the others who voted for this crap live. Great story. Thanks!

Nobody voted for it. Nobody. Get it?

The Justices who voted for it. They did vote. Get it?

"johnboy" > wrote in message
...
> > wrote in message
> m...
> > And this is exactly how to fix this problem. Just need to figure out
where
> > the others who voted for this crap live. Great story. Thanks!
>
> Nobody voted for it. Nobody. Get it?
>
>

> wrote in message
...
> The Justices who voted for it. They did vote. Get it?

Yep. Bad reading on my part.

I think this law should be expanded to include "original domain". Under
this, Native Americans could claim and build a casino where they want
as long as it makes money for the tribe. More Karma?

href="http://albums.photo.epson.com/j/AlbumIndex?u=4025706&a=30209382&vt=vp">Den's
1977 Puma</a>