If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...
In article >, BDK
> wrote: > It's amazing what nonsense the 911 kooks will swallow. It normally takes > months, minimum to set up a building for demolition, but yet the kooks > claim it was done almost instantly. > > A kook's mind is a terrible thing to...umm, waste again? I used to work with a "truther," and it's scary to see an otherwise intelligent individual get wrapped up in such nonsense. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...
On Oct 24, 12:30 pm, wrote:
> On Oct 20, 1:34 am, Venger > wrote: > > > > Mr. Silverstein, the owner of the World Trade Center buildings > admitted to pulling building 7 in a PBS special. < BS Snipped> http://www.popularmechanics.com/tech...ml?page=5#wtc7 |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...
In article >,
says... > wrote: > > On Oct 24, 12:30 pm, wrote: > >> On Oct 20, 1:34 am, Venger > wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> > >> Mr. Silverstein, the owner of the World Trade Center buildings > >> admitted to pulling building 7 in a PBS special. > > > > < BS Snipped> > > > > http://www.popularmechanics.com/tech...ml?page=5#wtc7 > > Wahahaha...........Ladies Home Journal has a better article that explains it > all. All you have is an article from a hobby mag? Wahahahaha................ > > > > It towers above the kookpages you read though.. BDK |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...
BDK wrote:
> In article >, > says... >> wrote: >>> On Oct 24, 12:30 pm, wrote: >>>> On Oct 20, 1:34 am, Venger > wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Mr. Silverstein, the owner of the World Trade Center buildings >>>> admitted to pulling building 7 in a PBS special. >>> >>> < BS Snipped> >>> >>> http://www.popularmechanics.com/tech...ml?page=5#wtc7 >> >> Wahahaha...........Ladies Home Journal has a better article that >> explains it all. All you have is an article from a hobby mag? >> Wahahahaha................ >> >> >> >> > > It towers above the kookpages you read though.. > > BDK The only ones I read I am replying to now. You are a real nut case and have nothing but tall stories. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...
RHF wrote:
> On Oct 24, 9:30 am, wrote: > >>On Oct 20, 1:34 am, Venger > wrote: >> >> wrote: >>> >>>>Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came >>>>crashing down on the day of 9/11. >> >>>Most people report they believe in ghosts and UFOs, which when combined >>>with 9/11 conspiracies make three addle-minded make-believe bits of idiocy. >> >>><snipped nincompoopery> >> >>>Truthers are stupid. >> >>>Venger >> >>Mr. Silverstein, the owner of the World Trade Center buildings >>admitted to pulling building 7 in a PBS special. >>see a clip on google video:http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329 >>According to several websites building 7 collapsed at or around 5:20 >>pm, just over 6 hours after the first two towers fell. > > > - Pretty impressive demolitions job considering in 6 hours > - a crew was called up with materials in hand and rigged > - that 47 story building to blow. > > Yes a Good Example of that All American > "Know How" and Can Do Attitude ! ~ RHF > . > Ass. It was known in the hour that a building -- I dunno from "7" -- was sufficiently damaged by the junk on and against it as to constitute a hazard to itself and the surround. It was dropped in on itself so that it wouldn't fall sideways. IIRC, one smaller service building (mostly automated) was already crushed. -- -------(m+ ~/)_| Gresham's Law is not worth a Continental. http://scrawlmark.org |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...
BDK wrote:
> In article .com>, > says... > >>On Oct 20, 1:34 am, Venger > wrote: >> wrote: >>> >>>>Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came >>>>crashing down on the day of 9/11. >>> >>>Most people report they believe in ghosts and UFOs, which when combined >>>with 9/11 conspiracies make three addle-minded make-believe bits of idiocy. >>> >>><snipped nincompoopery> >>> >>>Truthers are stupid. >>> >>>Venger >> >>Mr. Silverstein, the owner of the World Trade Center buildings >>admitted to pulling building 7 in a PBS special. >>see a clip on google video: http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329 >>According to several websites building 7 collapsed at or around 5:20 >>pm, just over 6 hours after the first two towers fell. Pretty >>impressive demolitions job considering in 6 hours a crew was called up >>with materials in hand and rigged that 47 story building to blow. >> >> >> > > > It's amazing what nonsense the 911 kooks will swallow. It normally takes > months, minimum to set up a building for demolition, but yet the kooks > claim it was done almost instantly. > > A kook's mind is a terrible thing to...umm, waste again? > > BDK Not much of an objection; the main towers were dropped in an hour, remember? And while it may take months to calculate and map the charges for a steel truss, nobody's gonna leave the charges in place for more than a couple days. For stressed skin, you point "here, here, and here." And nobody had to worry about getting rubble on the surrounding buildings, you know. -- -------(m+ ~/)_| Gresham's Law is not worth a Continental. http://scrawlmark.org |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...
BDK wrote:
> In article >, > says... > >>In article >, BDK > wrote: >> >> >>>It's amazing what nonsense the 911 kooks will swallow. It normally takes >>>months, minimum to set up a building for demolition, but yet the kooks >>>claim it was done almost instantly. >>> >>>A kook's mind is a terrible thing to...umm, waste again? >> >>I used to work with a "truther," and it's scary to see an otherwise >>intelligent individual get wrapped up in such nonsense. >> > > > I worked with a "Chemtrails" believer, a really smart kid, who seemed to > deteriorate over the course of a year to the point he got fired for > sleeping most of the time, so deeply that he had to be shaken awake, > yelling at him didn't work. When he wasn't sleeping, he was looking up > stuff about chemtrails, and sending it to several of us who laughed at > him. > > I don't know what he's doing now. Last I heard, he was back living at > home, and smoking a lot of pot. > > Then there's the religious whackjobs. We're down to two, both not too > bad, compared to a about a dozen we had previously, who were almost all > members of a local "cult" type church. What a joy to be around they > were.. > > BDK Oh? What about the Carbon Dioxide Conspiracy? HmmmMMM? It won the Nobel **** Prize, ya know. Not to mention an /Oscar/!!!1!! -- -------(m+ ~/)_| Gresham's Law is not worth a Continental. http://scrawlmark.org |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...
On Oct 19, 9:01 pm, schoenfeld....\
> Solving for t > < SNIP> Here.. another Video on 9/11 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcrF346sS_I |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1932 Ford "Deuce" and Flathead V8 75th Anniversary - "BlownHemi32.jpg" 513.4 KBytes yEnc "BlownFlathead.jpg" yEnc 513437 Bytes | mike[_20_] | Auto Photos | 0 | August 12th 07 04:35 PM |
1932 Ford "Deuce" and Flathead V8 75th Anniversary - "BlownHemi32.jpg" 513.4 KBytes yEnc "BlownFlathead.jpg" (2/2) yEnc 513437 Bytes | mike[_20_] | Auto Photos | 0 | August 12th 07 04:20 PM |
1932 Ford "Deuce" and Flathead V8 75th Anniversary - "BlownHemi32.jpg" 513.4 KBytes yEnc "BlownFlathead.jpg" (1/2) yEnc 513437 Bytes | mike[_20_] | Auto Photos | 0 | August 12th 07 04:20 PM |
Volkswagen exposes the swastika as "S" for "socialism" - known as the "swastika hubcap" car, the VW hubcaps (when spinning at certain speeds) remind some people of the symbol of the National Socialist German Workers' Par | rexcurrydotnet | Driving | 0 | February 23rd 06 06:23 PM |