Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...

On Oct 27, 3:22 am, Neil Ellwood >
wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 22:03:35 -0700, lib wrote:
> > My ex-wife's cousin, twice-removed, on her mother's side of the family
> > said that she had inside information that there was a irreplacable,
> > world-class collection of early Corvettes in WC7. She asked that we keep
> > that info out of the media. Please respect her wishes, as I have.
>
> Is the door locked or is her foot just holding it shut? Is there fresh
> toilet paper in there? Has the cloakroom attendant visited today?

- Who is in the next cubicle?

None other than 'CSM' Spender.

>
> --
> Neil
> reverse ra and delete l

On Oct 24, 6:23 pm, "Jones" > wrote:
> wrote:
> > On Oct 24, 12:30 pm, wrote:
> >> On Oct 20, 1:34 am, Venger > wrote:
>
> >> Mr. Silverstein, the owner of the World Trade Center buildings
> >> admitted to pulling building 7 in a PBS special.
>
> > < BS Snipped>
>
> >http://www.popularmechanics.com/tech.../1227842.html?...
>
> Wahahaha...........Ladies Home Journal has a better article that explains it
> all. All you have is an article from a hobby mag? Wahahahaha................


Or you can read the report from the Purdue University Engineering
Department.

http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/...Sozen.WTC.html

But hey, who wants to believe an esteemed Big 10 Engineering
Department??

On Oct 28, 9:11 pm, Larry Bud > wrote:
> On Oct 24, 6:23 pm, "Jones" > wrote:
>
> > wrote:
> > > On Oct 24, 12:30 pm, wrote:
> > >> On Oct 20, 1:34 am, Venger > wrote:
>
> > >> Mr. Silverstein, the owner of the World Trade Center buildings
> > >> admitted to pulling building 7 in a PBS special.
>
> > > < BS Snipped>
>
> > >

Or you can read the report from the Purdue University Engineering
Department.

http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/...Sozen.WTC.html

But hey, who wants to believe an esteemed Big 10 Engineering
Department??


http://ww4report.com/node/2413


- and for all those people trying to milk the " 9/11 Conspiracy
industry" cash cow

go out & get a real Job . .

On Oct 29, 10:16 am, harvey > wrote:
> Or you can read the report from the Purdue University Engineering
> Department.
>
> http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/...Sozen.WTC.html
>

Amazingly, when they ran the WTC simulation on one computer, the
computer next to it crashed.

Jones wrote:

>BDK wrote:
>
>
>>In article >,
says...
>>
>>
>>>BDK wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>In article >,
says...
>>>>
>>>>
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Oct 24, 12:30 pm, wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Oct 20, 1:34 am, Venger > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Mr. Silverstein, the owner of the World Trade Center buildings
>>>>>>>admitted to pulling building 7 in a PBS special.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>< BS Snipped>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://www.popularmechanics.com/tech...ml?page=5#wtc7
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>Wahahaha...........Ladies Home Journal has a better article that
>>>>>explains it all. All you have is an article from a hobby mag?
>>>>>Wahahahaha................
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>It towers above the kookpages you read though..
>>>>
>>>>BDK
>>>>
>>>>
>>>The only ones I read I am replying to now. You are a real nut case
>>>and have nothing but tall stories.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>I'm a nut case?
>>
>>BWHAHAHA!
>>
>>I couldn't even dream up the stuff you kooks swallow as proof..
>>
>>BDK
>>
>>
>
> You are the Kook that thinks a group took over some jets they had never
>flown before and singly handed pulled completely baffled the whole defense
>system of the USA. You are the nutjob here that is clear. You are incapable
>of free thinking past what has been spoon fed you.
>
>
>
>
#1. Paper argument. Before 9/11 the military would of never shot down a
civilian airliner full of citizens..
You know that. So it makes no difference for arguments sake that there
is a military defense system in the flight path.

#2. Look at who you are saying pulled this off..... THE BUSH ADMIN. I
mean com'on. Have you been paying ANY
attention to their competence over the last 7 years? That should be
enough to dispel ANY conspiracy theories connecting
them to planning AND PULLING OFF the towers collapse. We are lucky every
day we wake up and don't find the country
in full collapse from horrible and embarrassing actions, policies and
public statements from them...........



--
Ric Seyler
Online Racing: RicSeyler
GPL Handicap 6.35

http://www.pcola.gulf.net/~ricseyler
remove -SPAM- from email address
--------------------------------------
"Homer no function beer well without."
- H.J. Simpson

"harvey" > cross-posted in message
---snip the cross-post---

and you can stop cross-posting !!!

--
'Key
=====

On Oct 19, 10:04 pm, BDK > wrote:
> In article om>,
> says...
>

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/ar...531304,00.html


>
"" In almost every clip you'll see little puffs of dust spurting out
from the sides of the towers. There are two competing explanations for
these puffs of dust: 1) the force of the collapsing upper floors
raised the air pressure in the lower ones so dramatically that it
actually blew out the windows.
And 2) the towers did not collapse from the impact of two Boeing 767s
and the ensuing fires. T
hey were destroyed in a planned, controlled demolition. The dust puffs
you see on film are the
detonations of explosives planted there before the attacks.

People who believe the second explanation live in a very different
world from those who believe the first. In world No.
2, al-Qaeda is not responsible for the destruction of the World Trade
Center. The U.S. government is. The Pentagon
was not hit by a commercial jet; it was hit by a cruise missile.
United Flight 93 did not crash after its occupants
rushed the cockpit; it was deliberately taken down by a U.S. Air
Force fighter. The entire catastrophe was
planned and executed by federal officials in order to provide the U.S.
with a pretext for going to war in the
Middle East and, by extension, as a means of consolidating and
extending the power of the Bush Administration.
""

On Oct 29, 10:16 am, harvey > wrote:
> On Oct 28, 9:11 pm, Larry Bud > wrote:
>
> > On Oct 24, 6:23 pm, "Jones" > wrote:
>
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Oct 24, 12:30 pm, wrote:
> > > >> On Oct 20, 1:34 am, Venger > wrote:
>
> > > >> Mr. Silverstein, the owner of the World Trade Center buildings
> > > >> admitted to pulling building 7 in a PBS special.
>
> > > > < BS Snipped>
>
> Or you can read the report from the Purdue University Engineering
> Department.
>
> http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/...Sozen.WTC.html
>
> But hey, who wants to believe an esteemed Big 10 Engineering
> Department??
>
> http://ww4report.com/node/2413
>
> - and for all those people trying to milk the " 9/11 Conspiracy
> industry" cash cow
>
> go out & get a real Job . .

and for all those people trying to milk the " 9/11 Conspiracy
industry" cash cow

go out & get a real Job . .

Annika1980 wrote:

> On Oct 29, 10:16 am, harvey > wrote:
>
>>Or you can read the report from the Purdue University Engineering
>>Department.
>>
>>http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/...Sozen.WTC.html
>>
>
>
> Amazingly, when they ran the WTC simulation on one computer, the
> computer next to it crashed.
>
>
When they ran it on the UND computer, a student aircraft crashed, but
these Norwegians'll do /anything/ for attention...

--
-------(m+
~/)_|
Gresham's Law is not worth a Continental.
http://scrawlmark.org

On Oct 29, 9:17 pm, harvey > wrote:
> On Oct 19, 10:04 pm, BDK > wrote:
>
> > In article om>,
> > says...
>
> http://www.time.com/time/magazine/ar...531304,00.html
>
>
>
> "" In almost every clip you'll see little puffs of dust spurting out
> from the sides of the towers. There are two competing explanations for
> these puffs of dust: 1) the force of the collapsing upper floors
> raised the air pressure in the lower ones so dramatically that it
> actually blew out the windows.
> And 2) the towers did not collapse from the impact of two Boeing 767s
> and the ensuing fires. T
> hey were destroyed in a planned, controlled demolition. The dust puffs
> you see on film are the
> detonations of explosives planted there before the attacks.
>
> People who believe the second explanation live in a very different
> world from those who believe the first. In world No.
> 2, al-Qaeda is not responsible for the destruction of the World Trade
> Center. The U.S. government is. The Pentagon
> was not hit by a commercial jet; it was hit by a cruise missile.
> United Flight 93 did not crash after its occupants
> rushed the cockpit; it was deliberately taken down by a U.S. Air
> Force fighter. The entire catastrophe was
> planned and executed by federal officials in order to provide the U.S.
> with a pretext for going to war in the
> Middle East and, by extension, as a means of consolidating and
> extending the power of the Bush Administration.
> ""

This is where the whole Wingnut argument falls apart..

-
In short, they got us. It wasn't a David Copperfield trick. DIck
Cheney wasn't sitting in a toilet stall somewhere, remotley
orchestrating the whole thing..

They Got Us.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcrF346sS_I