Mopar Follies (was: easiest engine)

In rec.autos.tech TNKEV > wrote:
> Edward Strauss in reply to nate nagel wrote:
> > You are not everyone and I am not embarrassed.
> >
> >
> he isn't everyone, everyone doesn't have to chime in and tell you how
> embarrased
> you should be at making a fool of yourself on usenet (wich is archived
> forever BTW)
> so even your great grandchildren can see what an idiot you were being.

You don't like my opinion so I am a fool and should be embarrased? I am amazed
at your self importance. As far as being archived forever I think thats great.
Someone with a lot of time might be able to search through it for the few facts
that are scattered about.

> >
> >How long will it take to make you realize that what you say means
> nothing
> >to me?

> if what he says means nothing then why do you feel the need to reply?

The same reason you want to dive in...


> --



> http://www.hostmybb.com/phpbb/index.php?mforum=rftg
> B-N-Ps, no B no Ps,no spam, trades,post,chat
> come join!

In rec.autos.tech Nate Nagel > wrote:
> Edward Strauss wrote:
> > In rec.autos.tech Nate Nagel > wrote:
> >
> >>Edward Strauss wrote:
> >>
> >>>In rec.autos.tech Nate Nagel > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Edward Strauss wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>In rec.autos.tech Nate Nagel > wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Edward Strauss wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>In rec.autos.tech N8N > wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Edward Strauss wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>In rec.autos.tech N8N > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Edward Strauss wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>><snip>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>All of the above is your opinion. My opinion is that external ballast resistors
> >>>>>>>>>>>were used on Mopar's far longer than they should of been.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>nate
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>(not usually prone to grammar lames, but this has been pointed out to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>you before by at least one other poster...)
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>Well now, I'll get right on it. Since this was pointed out to me by an Internet
> >>>>>>>>>>>Expert I just gotta change my ways...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Well, if you LIKE coming across as an illiterate moron, that's fine by
> >>>>>>>>>>me. Actually it serves as a useful warning that you don't know what
> >>>>>>>>>>the hell you're talking about, You've got a lot of free time but not a
> >>>>>>>>>>whole lot of knowledge, it would seem.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>I see. You think that this newsgroup helps people showcase skills? You are not even in
> >>>>>>>>>a position to determine your own knowledge let alone anyone elses. Self serving stories
> >>>>>>>>>and opinion are not fact. Get over it... And when all else fails you can try cutting
> >>>>>>>>>people down but that just shows the sorry state that your mind is in.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Whatever. You're the one that couldn't pass *either* a 3rd grade
> >>>>>>>>English final or an ASE exam... your opinion of me means exactly zippy
> >>>>>>>>to me.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Again, your running your mouth about something you have no real knowledge of.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>There's really no response to this, other than hearty laughter and maybe
> >>>>>>an IKYABWAI...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>I've been laughing quite awhile.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>So have the rest of us. The difference is everyone's laughing at you
> >>>>but you.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>So, you are everyone???
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>All that I am doing is responding to the nonsense you post. Why would I
> >>>>>>>have an opinion of a person who posts on the internet??
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>You've *expressed* an opinion, as I have of you.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>You have generated more words. What meaning, if any is hard to tell.
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>OK, I'll break it down into words of few syllables for you: You are an
> >>>>idiot. You have little, if anything worthwhile to say and much of what
> >>>>you do say is factually inaccurate. My response to your posts is more
> >>>>to correct them for the benefit of anyone intelligent but uninformed
> >>>>that might be reading, as obviously attempting to get you to understand
> >>>>basic concepts would have happened by now if you were at all educable.
> >>>>In short, I wish you'd just stop posting, as all you're doing is
> >>>>promoting uninformed opinion and half-true (if that) "facts" and your
> >>>>continued ignorance is tiresome.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Please go away.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Words, as in the paragraph above have no business being written. They should
> >>>be spoken. Anyone with any common sense would know that. In this world of
> >>>opinion and self serving stories that is probably the best that you can do.
> >>>How long will it take to make you realize that what you say means nothing
> >>>to me?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>You are as common as they come.
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >>I was just saying what everyone was thinking... would it have been
> >>better to not say anything and let you keep embarassing yourself?
> >
> >
> >
> > You are not everyone and I am not embarrassed. Are you a graduate of
> > some ten point program??

> nah, just some rinky dink engineering school. As opposed to you who
> obviously know more about cars and ignition systems than everyone else
> on the planet, since you are apparently trying to educate us all and
> none of us are getting it.


Nope, just giving an opinion. Nothing close to your volume of words.
You keep using the word "us". Do you have a mouse in your pocket or
share a keyboard or do you claim to represent everyone else who reads this
group besides me?


> nate

> --
> replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
> http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel

Edward Strauss wrote:
> In rec.autos.tech Nate Nagel > wrote:
>
>>Edward Strauss wrote:
>>
>>>In rec.autos.tech Nate Nagel > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Edward Strauss wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>In rec.autos.tech Nate Nagel > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Edward Strauss wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In rec.autos.tech Nate Nagel > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Edward Strauss wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>In rec.autos.tech N8N > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Edward Strauss wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>In rec.autos.tech N8N > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Edward Strauss wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>><snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>All of the above is your opinion. My opinion is that external ballast resistors
>>>>>>>>>>>>>were used on Mopar's far longer than they should of been.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>nate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>(not usually prone to grammar lames, but this has been pointed out to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>you before by at least one other poster...)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Well now, I'll get right on it. Since this was pointed out to me by an Internet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Expert I just gotta change my ways...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Well, if you LIKE coming across as an illiterate moron, that's fine by
>>>>>>>>>>>>me. Actually it serves as a useful warning that you don't know what
>>>>>>>>>>>>the hell you're talking about, You've got a lot of free time but not a
>>>>>>>>>>>>whole lot of knowledge, it would seem.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>I see. You think that this newsgroup helps people showcase skills? You are not even in
>>>>>>>>>>>a position to determine your own knowledge let alone anyone elses. Self serving stories
>>>>>>>>>>>and opinion are not fact. Get over it... And when all else fails you can try cutting
>>>>>>>>>>>people down but that just shows the sorry state that your mind is in.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Whatever. You're the one that couldn't pass *either* a 3rd grade
>>>>>>>>>>English final or an ASE exam... your opinion of me means exactly zippy
>>>>>>>>>>to me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Again, your running your mouth about something you have no real knowledge of.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>There's really no response to this, other than hearty laughter and maybe
>>>>>>>>an IKYABWAI...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I've been laughing quite awhile.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>So have the rest of us. The difference is everyone's laughing at you
>>>>>>but you.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>So, you are everyone???
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>All that I am doing is responding to the nonsense you post. Why would I
>>>>>>>>>have an opinion of a person who posts on the internet??
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You've *expressed* an opinion, as I have of you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You have generated more words. What meaning, if any is hard to tell.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>OK, I'll break it down into words of few syllables for you: You are an
>>>>>>idiot. You have little, if anything worthwhile to say and much of what
>>>>>>you do say is factually inaccurate. My response to your posts is more
>>>>>>to correct them for the benefit of anyone intelligent but uninformed
>>>>>>that might be reading, as obviously attempting to get you to understand
>>>>>>basic concepts would have happened by now if you were at all educable.
>>>>>>In short, I wish you'd just stop posting, as all you're doing is
>>>>>>promoting uninformed opinion and half-true (if that) "facts" and your
>>>>>>continued ignorance is tiresome.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Please go away.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Words, as in the paragraph above have no business being written. They should
>>>>>be spoken. Anyone with any common sense would know that. In this world of
>>>>>opinion and self serving stories that is probably the best that you can do.
>>>>>How long will it take to make you realize that what you say means nothing
>>>>>to me?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>You are as common as they come.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>I was just saying what everyone was thinking... would it have been
>>>>better to not say anything and let you keep embarassing yourself?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>You are not everyone and I am not embarrassed. Are you a graduate of
>>>some ten point program??
>
>
>>nah, just some rinky dink engineering school. As opposed to you who
>>obviously know more about cars and ignition systems than everyone else
>>on the planet, since you are apparently trying to educate us all and
>>none of us are getting it.
>
>
>
> Nope, just giving an opinion. Nothing close to your volume of words.
> You keep using the word "us". Do you have a mouse in your pocket or
> share a keyboard or do you claim to represent everyone else who reads this
> group besides me?
>

I think I can safely speak for most of the group when I say that a lot
of the time we don't have a clue what the hell you're on about, just
that you really, really don't like MoPar or external ballasts.

nate


--
replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel

In rec.autos.tech Nate Nagel > wrote:
> Edward Strauss wrote:
> > In rec.autos.tech Nate Nagel > wrote:
> >
> >>Edward Strauss wrote:
> >>
> >>>In rec.autos.tech Nate Nagel > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Edward Strauss wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>In rec.autos.tech Nate Nagel > wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Edward Strauss wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>In rec.autos.tech Nate Nagel > wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Edward Strauss wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>In rec.autos.tech N8N > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Edward Strauss wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>In rec.autos.tech N8N > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>Edward Strauss wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>><snip>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>All of the above is your opinion. My opinion is that external ballast resistors
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>were used on Mopar's far longer than they should of been.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>nate
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>(not usually prone to grammar lames, but this has been pointed out to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>you before by at least one other poster...)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Well now, I'll get right on it. Since this was pointed out to me by an Internet
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Expert I just gotta change my ways...
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>Well, if you LIKE coming across as an illiterate moron, that's fine by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>me. Actually it serves as a useful warning that you don't know what
> >>>>>>>>>>>>the hell you're talking about, You've got a lot of free time but not a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>whole lot of knowledge, it would seem.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>I see. You think that this newsgroup helps people showcase skills? You are not even in
> >>>>>>>>>>>a position to determine your own knowledge let alone anyone elses. Self serving stories
> >>>>>>>>>>>and opinion are not fact. Get over it... And when all else fails you can try cutting
> >>>>>>>>>>>people down but that just shows the sorry state that your mind is in.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Whatever. You're the one that couldn't pass *either* a 3rd grade
> >>>>>>>>>>English final or an ASE exam... your opinion of me means exactly zippy
> >>>>>>>>>>to me.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>Again, your running your mouth about something you have no real knowledge of.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>There's really no response to this, other than hearty laughter and maybe
> >>>>>>>>an IKYABWAI...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>I've been laughing quite awhile.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>So have the rest of us. The difference is everyone's laughing at you
> >>>>>>but you.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>So, you are everyone???
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>All that I am doing is responding to the nonsense you post. Why would I
> >>>>>>>>>have an opinion of a person who posts on the internet??
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>You've *expressed* an opinion, as I have of you.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>You have generated more words. What meaning, if any is hard to tell.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>OK, I'll break it down into words of few syllables for you: You are an
> >>>>>>idiot. You have little, if anything worthwhile to say and much of what
> >>>>>>you do say is factually inaccurate. My response to your posts is more
> >>>>>>to correct them for the benefit of anyone intelligent but uninformed
> >>>>>>that might be reading, as obviously attempting to get you to understand
> >>>>>>basic concepts would have happened by now if you were at all educable.
> >>>>>>In short, I wish you'd just stop posting, as all you're doing is
> >>>>>>promoting uninformed opinion and half-true (if that) "facts" and your
> >>>>>>continued ignorance is tiresome.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Please go away.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Words, as in the paragraph above have no business being written. They should
> >>>>>be spoken. Anyone with any common sense would know that. In this world of
> >>>>>opinion and self serving stories that is probably the best that you can do.
> >>>>>How long will it take to make you realize that what you say means nothing
> >>>>>to me?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>You are as common as they come.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>I was just saying what everyone was thinking... would it have been
> >>>>better to not say anything and let you keep embarassing yourself?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>You are not everyone and I am not embarrassed. Are you a graduate of
> >>>some ten point program??
> >
> >
> >>nah, just some rinky dink engineering school. As opposed to you who
> >>obviously know more about cars and ignition systems than everyone else
> >>on the planet, since you are apparently trying to educate us all and
> >>none of us are getting it.
> >
> >
> >
> > Nope, just giving an opinion. Nothing close to your volume of words.
> > You keep using the word "us". Do you have a mouse in your pocket or
> > share a keyboard or do you claim to represent everyone else who reads this
> > group besides me?
> >

> I think I can safely speak for most of the group when I say that a lot
> of the time we don't have a clue what the hell you're on about, just
> that you really, really don't like MoPar or external ballasts.


You can claim whatever you want, make up whatever you want. You do not even know
"most" of this group. You are like a preacher in a virtual tent revivial.
Believe me, I am right, everyone is on my side, how can I be wrong, blah, blah, blah..



> nate


> --
> replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
> http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel

On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, TNKEV wrote:

> Edward Strauss wrote:
>> You don't like my opinion so I am a fool and should be embarrased?
>
> I could care less of your opinion, and I could care less about the
> subject and I could care less if you are embarrassed.

And me, I *couldn't* care less about any of those things. If you *could*
care less, it means you care _some_.

Edward Strauss wrote:

<deleted>

Some monkeys WILL fling a lot of poo, won't they?

In rec.autos.tech TNKEV > wrote:
> Edward Strauss wrote:
> > You don't like my opinion so I am a fool and should be embarrased?

> I could care less of your opinion, and I could care less about the
> subject
> and I could care less if you are embarrassed.


> I am just enjoying a good laugh at your expense!

> have a wonderful day!


You care enough to post so you must really be a caring person...




> --



> http://www.hostmybb.com/phpbb/index.php?mforum=rftg
> B-N-Ps, no B no Ps,no spam, trades,post,chat
> come join!

In rec.autos.tech Daniel J. Stern > wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, TNKEV wrote:

> > Edward Strauss wrote:
> >> You don't like my opinion so I am a fool and should be embarrased?
> >
> > I could care less of your opinion, and I could care less about the
> > subject and I could care less if you are embarrassed.

> And me, I *couldn't* care less about any of those things. If you *could*
> care less, it means you care _some_.



Another caring person. The world must be full of them...

In rec.autos.tech Steve > wrote:
> Edward Strauss wrote:

> <deleted>

> Some monkeys WILL fling a lot of poo, won't they?


Sure will.