If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
2013 Accord: priceless quote
The local newspaper has an auto-related section that's mainly ads, with
a few "articles" thrown in that are usually puff pieces with a big chunk of their content lifted from manufacturer press releases. Yesterday there was one touting the rollout of the 2013 Accord at a local dealership. After pointing out that Honda had been facing increased competition from American and Korean sedans, the piece quoted the dealership's sales manager as he proudly touted a new "feature": "Honda's really listened to what the people want. The biggest complaint had been the road noise. They've addressed that by getting rid of the double-wishbone front suspension and going with struts." I was reminded of H. L. Mencken's definition of democracy as "the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard". |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
2013 Accord: priceless quote
"Dave Garrett" wrote
> "...The biggest complaint had been the road noise. > They've addressed that by getting rid of the double-wishbone front > suspension and going with struts." > > I was reminded of H. L. Mencken's definition of democracy as "the theory > that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good > and hard". I'm apparently one of the common people, very appreciative of reduced road noise, though I'm not so sure about it at the expense of changing to struts. What do other "quiet" cars use for front suspension components? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
2013 Accord: priceless quote
Dave Garrett > wrote in news:MPG.2adb964329b3ff1398a308
@208.90.168.18: > The local newspaper has an auto-related section that's mainly ads, with > a few "articles" thrown in that are usually puff pieces with a big chunk > of their content lifted from manufacturer press releases. They're /all/ mostly like that. Sometimes they have one or two columnists producing original and interesting material; I read those and skip the rest. > Yesterday > there was one touting the rollout of the 2013 Accord at a local > dealership. > > After pointing out that Honda had been facing increased competition from > American and Korean sedans, the piece quoted the dealership's sales > manager as he proudly touted a new "feature": "Honda's really listened > to what the people want. The biggest complaint had been the road noise. > They've addressed that by getting rid of the double-wishbone front > suspension and going with struts." That'a an odd comment. There is no connection between the two suspension designs and road-noise. > > I was reminded of H. L. Mencken's definition of democracy as "the theory > that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good > and hard". Mencken's statement had to do with governments, not with consumer-goods companies or any other private concerns. Plus, in his original quote, there is no comma. -- Tegger |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
2013 Accord: priceless quote
On 10/07/2012 02:34 PM, Howard Lester wrote:
> "Dave Garrett" wrote > >> "...The biggest complaint had been the road noise. >> They've addressed that by getting rid of the double-wishbone front >> suspension and going with struts." >> >> I was reminded of H. L. Mencken's definition of democracy as "the theory >> that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good >> and hard". > > I'm apparently one of the common people, very appreciative of reduced > road noise, though I'm not so sure about it at the expense of changing > to struts. What do other "quiet" cars use for front suspension components? well, the acura tl is pretty quiet - that still has wishbones. bottom line, the "noise" excuse is complete bull - there is no engineering connection between wishbones and increased noise. if anything, it's the other way around because wishbones are a less direct sound path. -- fact check required |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
2013 Accord: priceless quote
On 10/07/2012 05:50 PM, Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote:
> In >, > > wrote: > >>> After pointing out that Honda had been facing increased competition from >>> American and Korean sedans, the piece quoted the dealership's sales >>> manager as he proudly touted a new "feature": "Honda's really listened >>> to what the people want. The biggest complaint had been the road noise. >>> They've addressed that by getting rid of the double-wishbone front >>> suspension and going with struts." >> >> >> >> That'a an odd comment. There is no connection between the two suspension >> designs and road-noise. > > Technically, there is. it's not a "technical" connection in the engineering sense, just the financial sense. > > If they make a cheaper suspension, they can take some of that money and > put it toward noise suppression--and still keep up their #1 goal, > corporate profits at any cost. i still say their "ex" frod usa chairman is a trojan horse continuing to work for detroit and bent on honda's destruction. and he's right on target. -- fact check required |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
2013 Accord: priceless quote
"Elmo P. Shagnasty" > wrote in
: > In article >, > Tegger > wrote: > > > There is no connection between the two >> suspension designs and road-noise. > > Technically, there is. > > If they make a cheaper suspension, they can take some of that money > and put it toward noise suppression--and still keep up their #1 goal, > corporate profits at any cost. > Honda, like all other manufacturers, went to strut front-ends on lower-end vehicles in order to help keep costs down. The primary impetus for this was safety and emissions regulations, which combine to /dramatically/ raise the cost of developing and bulding a car. Those costs are less onerous if the car has a higher sell-price and higher margin, but they're a killer for the low-end of the market. As for "corporate profits at any cost": Any company which tries that is doomed to failure. Profits come from satisfied customers. Unsatisfied customers take their money elsewhere, resulting in eventual bankruptcy of the indiscriminately-cost-cutting company. ALL companies, just like ALL families and ALL individuals, MUST spend less than they take in, so profit is an /absolutely necessary/ goal for everybody, including Honda. -- Tegger |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
2013 Accord: priceless quote
On 10/08/2012 03:30 PM, Tegger wrote:
> "Elmo P. > wrote in > : > >> In >, >> > wrote: >> >> >> There is no connection between the two >>> suspension designs and road-noise. >> >> Technically, there is. >> >> If they make a cheaper suspension, they can take some of that money >> and put it toward noise suppression--and still keep up their #1 goal, >> corporate profits at any cost. >> > > > > Honda, like all other manufacturers, went to strut front-ends on lower-end > vehicles in order to help keep costs down. The primary impetus for this was > safety and emissions regulations, which combine to /dramatically/ raise the > cost of developing and bulding a car. safety + emissions != cost of developing. safety + emissions != cost of building. "safety" is basically just making cars heavy and adding airbags. airbags don't cost that much to the manufacturer, and making the car heavy costs only the materials, and that's almost nothing extra. "emissions" is basically just the cat [which has been there for more than 30 years already] and sensors [see above]. the rest is software, and that effectively costs nothing. > Those costs are less onerous if the > car has a higher sell-price and higher margin, but they're a killer for the > low-end of the market. any mba course will teach you about product differentiation. i.e. make the "high end" product with the high price "different" to the low end stuff. otherwise nobody will pay the premium. but, this works only if you have a lock on the market. honda don't, they have loads of competition. making their product generic and indistinguishable from the competition, and trying to charge a premium price - well, that's where there's an obvious disconnect that's either the product of stupidity, or a trojan horse. > > As for "corporate profits at any cost": Any company which tries that is > doomed to failure. Profits come from satisfied customers. Unsatisfied > customers take their money elsewhere, resulting in eventual bankruptcy of > the indiscriminately-cost-cutting company. > > ALL companies, just like ALL families and ALL individuals, MUST spend less > than they take in, so profit is an /absolutely necessary/ goal for > everybody, including Honda. there's profits and there's margins. woolmort make ultra-skinny margins. much skinnier than honda. but they make HUGE profits because they have successfully differentiated themselves and have huge volumes. honda are making themselves generic, not different, and they're losing volume. they're going to get eaten by frod and toyota. and i think the frod part is by design. -- fact check required |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2013 Honda Accord priced from $21,680*, rated at 27/36 MPG | MummyChunk | Honda | 0 | September 23rd 12 12:28 AM |
2013 Honda Accord hits 36 MPG highway | MummyChunk | Honda | 0 | September 6th 12 02:15 AM |
2013 Honda Accord production fires up with Earth Dreams power | MummyChunk | Honda | 0 | August 24th 12 07:17 PM |
OT, but priceless. | MLOM | Driving | 13 | January 10th 07 02:42 AM |