If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#281
|
|||
|
|||
Mopar Follies
In rec.autos.tech Daniel J. Stern > wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, TNKEV wrote: > > Edward Strauss wrote: > >> You don't like my opinion so I am a fool and should be embarrased? > > > > I could care less of your opinion, and I could care less about the > > subject and I could care less if you are embarrassed. > And me, I *couldn't* care less about any of those things. If you *could* > care less, it means you care _some_. Another caring person. The world must be full of them... |
Ads |
#282
|
|||
|
|||
Mopar Follies
In rec.autos.tech Steve > wrote:
> Edward Strauss wrote: > <deleted> > Some monkeys WILL fling a lot of poo, won't they? Sure will. |
#283
|
|||
|
|||
Mopar Follies
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 11:14:10 +0000 (UTC), Edward Strauss
> wrote: >Yes, your giving me your opinion. My opinion was that ballast resistors were used on >Mopar's far longer than they should of been. should of been? |
#284
|
|||
|
|||
Mopar Follies
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 08:30:46 +0000 (UTC), Edward Strauss
> wrote: >> Mopar eliminated the ballast resistor in model year 1978 with the >> Omni/Horizon. My '79 had one. 1 Ohm, if I remember correctly. >Which GM's had external, firewall mounted, ballast resistors? 1953-54 Buick, Olds, Cadillac. Maybe even a few more later years. 1959+ had resistance wire in the harness. >With Fords they had the wire not the external firewall mounted ballast resistor. Sunbeams using Ford engines used one one that was not resistance wire. |
#285
|
|||
|
|||
Mopar Follies
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:36:25 +0000 (UTC), Edward Strauss
> wrote: >A mag would of worked fine. A Vertex only needs one wire. would of? |
#286
|
|||
|
|||
Mopar Follies
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 06:10:45 -0500, Nate Nagel >
wrote: >> share a keyboard or do you claim to represent everyone else who reads this >> group besides me? Nate can speak for me. Or for the group. Nate for President in 2008! Would be better than the last 25 years of trials. >I think I can safely speak for most of the group when I say that a lot >of the time we don't have a clue what the hell you're on about, just >that you really, really don't like MoPar or external ballasts. I wonder how he feels about ballast tubes in some antique radios. Maybe he prefers the Ford/GM thinking of a resistance wire in the power cord instead. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rec.autos.makers.chrysler FAQ, Part 1/6 | Dr. David Zatz | Chrysler | 5 | June 24th 05 05:27 AM |
rec.autos.makers.chrysler FAQ, Part 1/6 | Dr. David Zatz | Chrysler | 5 | June 8th 05 05:28 AM |
rec.autos.makers.chrysler FAQ, Part 1/6 | Dr. David Zatz | Chrysler | 5 | May 24th 05 05:27 AM |
rec.autos.makers.chrysler FAQ, Part 1/6 | Dr. David Zatz | Chrysler | 4 | February 2nd 05 05:22 AM |
rec.autos.makers.chrysler FAQ, Part 1/6 | Dr. David Zatz | Chrysler | 10 | December 18th 04 05:15 AM |